Elder of Ziyon Daily News |
- Iran's Supreme Leader: Zionists are behind all intra-Muslim problems
- 10/14 Links Pt2: PA Benefits from Offshore Gas, Facebook buys Onavo for $200 Mil
- Gazans tell of life under siege. Egyptian siege.
- Bolonium
- 10/14 Links Pt1: IDF Watching Tunnel For A Year, PA Celebrates Terrorist Murderer of French Tourist
- 50 years ago: Arabs emphatically reject peace. (Sound familiar?)
- Stunning photos of the Hamas terror tunnel, plus video
- A legal scholar details ICRC bias against Israel over "occupation" of Gaza
Iran's Supreme Leader: Zionists are behind all intra-Muslim problems Posted: 14 Oct 2013 05:06 PM PDT The Hajj message of Iran's "Supreme Leader" Ayatollah Khamenei says that every single problem in the Muslim world is caused by Zionists and the West. Not a single Muslim is guilty of any crimes, terrorism, civil war, chemical weapons usage, infighting or anything else unseemly - it is all controlled by the expansive network of Zionists and their allies. I particularly like how he positions the Syrian regime as a Muslim nation when it has been largely secular and anti-Islamist. ...The existence of civil wars, religious and denominational prejudices and political instabilities, the prevalence of cruel terrorism, the emergence of extreme groups and orientations- which like savage tribes in history, cut open the chests of human beings and rip their hearts out with their teeth- the emergence of armed mercenaries who kill women and children, cut off the heads of men and rape women and who do such horrible and disgusting crimes in the name of religion are all the products of the satanic and arrogant plots of foreign intelligence services and their regional agents. This means that Islam strongly rejects any idea and belief which views a number of Muslims and believers in Ka'bah and monotheism as people who are outside the circle of Islam. These orientations which are based on takfirism, which have become playthings in the hands of the treacherous Zionist politicians and their western supporters- commit serious crimes and shed the blood of Muslims and innocent people, and the people who claim to be religious, who call themselves clerics and who fuel the fire of fitna between Shia and Sunni and other denominations- should know that the hajj pilgrimage will thwart their claims.More in an upcoming post about how the symbolic "stoning of the devil" during Hajj has now become a symbolic "stoning of Zionists." | ||
10/14 Links Pt2: PA Benefits from Offshore Gas, Facebook buys Onavo for $200 Mil Posted: 14 Oct 2013 03:00 PM PDT From Ian: The Diplomatic Bonus of Gaza's Offshore Natural Gas Despite its location, the field belongs to the PA rather than the Hamas regime in Gaza. It was discovered by a British company, BG (formerly British Gas), which continues to hold the license. The PA, seeking a greater share of the revenues, is now negotiating a revised concession agreement with BG and another investor, Consolidated Contractors Company, a Palestinian-owned, Greek-based engineering group. Israeli acquiescence is needed for security reasons, since the gas lies in an area patrolled by the Israeli navy. Yet former prime minister Ehud Barak conceded ownership of the field to the Palestinians in 2001 as a goodwill gesture, adjusting the notional maritime boundary in the area so that the whole of Gaza Marine lies in Palestinian waters rather than crossing into Israel's Exclusive Economic Zone.David Singer: World Bank Exposes PLO's Disastrous Miscalculations Regrettably those affected by the PLO's political stance – the West Bank Arab population – are denied any say in determining whether changes need to take place that would improve their economic and political fortunes.Bedouin Myth No.1 – Indigenous? Professor Ruth Kark of the Geography Department of the Hebrew University, considered an expert on conceptions of land ownership in traditional and pre-modern cultures, in an article that appeared in the "Middle East Quarterly," enumerated the generally accepted parameters of the term "indigenous," and explains why the Bedouins cannot be included in this category. Here is the synopsis of her conclusions.The EU's misguided singling out of Israel Instead of being one-sided in their criticism, the EU should redouble its efforts to promote economic development in the West Bank as opposed to taking punitive steps against one side. Perversely, a ban such as this would hurt struggling Palestinians more than it would hurt Israel.Not accurate, not impartial: BBC report on murder in Brosh HaBika'a Towards the end of the report we find a paragraph which is phrased in such a way as to imply to readers that there is reason to question Israeli definitions of terror attacks – including the murder of Tomer Hazan, which the perpetrator admitted was intended to extort the release of a relative imprisoned for terror offences.BBC template response to audience complaints about Psagot Several readers have informed us of responses they have received from the BBC in reply to complaints regarding the fact that the attack in Psagot on October 5th did not receive any coverage from the BBC until four days after the event when two suspects were arrested in Al Bireh.The paper which hates Britain? Guardian leaks 'worst blow to British intel ever' The Guardian's editor Alan Rusbridger, typifying the vitriol directed against the West by many within the leftist intelligentsia, in defending his paper's right to publish classified documents, referred to George Orwell's book '1984' and argued that US and British intelligence gathering went "beyond Orwell's imagination". However, Orwell understood the advantages of even flawed democracies over totalitarian regimes and realized the danger of an intellectual elite which doesn't understand such stark moral differences.Al-Hiwar TV: Islamists' Loudspeaker in Europe The Muslim Brotherhood, despite having officially renounced violence, has been known for inciting often-violent political and social instability; it also openly claims responsibility for the installation of Hamas, a terrorist organization committed by its charter to the destruction of Israel.Holocaust-denying Romanian minister attends memorial Dan Sova, Romania's minister for national projects and infrastructure, addressed a crowd of dignitaries on October 9 in the Romanian capital at a ceremony held on Romania's national Holocaust Memorial Day — a date marked officially for the third time since its introduction in 2010.Clinton Foundation Received Millions from Saudis, Qatar, Iran A senior Muslim Brotherhood operative recently arrested in Egypt worked for years at the William J. Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation has also received millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and a foundation that is an Iranian regime front.Czech President: My Kotel Wish Came True Zeman placed a new note with a new wish on it in the cracks between the stones on Sunday's visit as well.Does Nobel winner Higgs support an Israel boycott? "It is very ironic that Israeli scientists are dominating the Nobel prizes yet again, and the British winner of the Nobel prize is, in effect, boycotting them," Middle East commentator Tom Gross said, after writing on his site last Wednesday that Higgs "is calling for an academic boycott of Israel."Facebook buys Onavo Israeli mobile analytics company Onavo has announced its sale to Facebook. The deal is being reported to be worth between $100 million-$200 million.Security control room in a smartphone When a baby is choking somewhere inside the winding cobblestoned streets of Jerusalem's Old City, or in any Israeli neighborhood, locals powering motorcycles with ambulance gear give help before the paramedics arrive. This is thanks to Israel's one-of-a-kind volunteer emergency response organization United Hatzalah.70 years after revolt, Sobibor secrets are yet to be unearthed It was the most successful prisoner revolt during World War II, but the Sobibor uprising never became a primary symbol of the Holocaust. Seventy years later, archeologists at the former death camp are rewriting what's known about Sobibor's design, and unearthing haunting glimpses of its Jewish victims.Ingathering and digitizing the Diaspora's rare Hebrew books In a project as ambitious as the Great Library of Alexandria — which, starting in the 3rd century BCE under the Ptolemies, endeavored to copy all scrolls that entered the port — Israel's National Library is seeking to digitize and store all of the world's Jewish texts.IDF Blog: 40 Years Since the Yom Kippur War No.2: The Counterattack After a surprise attack that sparks the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the IDF must regroup and act quickly against Egypt and Syria. The enemies' anti-aircraft missiles overwhelm the Israel Air Force, forcing the IDF to rely almost completely on its ground and naval forces. The proximity of Israeli villages and towns to the Syrian border poses an urgent challenge, pushing the IDF to confront enemy forces in battle. | ||
Gazans tell of life under siege. Egyptian siege. Posted: 14 Oct 2013 01:00 PM PDT From Ma'ariv, translated by Yoel: The crisis between Hamas and the new regime in Egypt is worsening: in Egypt there is no intention in the mean time to scale down on the military operation in Sinai, which started after the toppling of the Muslim Brotherhood regime. The Egyptians accuse Hamas of collaborating with jihadi elements operating in the peninsula, and the foreign minister, Nabil Fahmy, declared that if the need arises the Egyptian army will use military force against the Gaza Strip. Military sources even said that a target list for Gaza was drawn up to allow an aerial attack. Too bad Ma'ariv didn't get a chance to ask the Gazans what they thought of their government building tunnels to kidnap Israelis instead of houses and apartments. | ||
Posted: 14 Oct 2013 11:00 AM PDT Over the weekend, the Lancet published an article called "Improving forensic investigation for polonium poisoning" which is being misrepresented by the media, especially Arab media. AFP reports: Swiss radiation experts have confirmed they found traces of polonium on clothing used by Yasser Arafat which "support the possibility" the veteran Palestinian leader was poisoned.This is not the results of the tests done on exhumed samples from Arafat. This is simply a regurgitation of what the Swiss researchers said last year, just published in a new place. The very end of the AFP report confirms this: Beatrice Schaad, head of communications at the Vaudois University Hospital Center which is in charge of the institute, said the case report was the "scientific version" of what was given to the media.For those who cared, the specific results were published last year as well. And the numbers still don't add up. The current Lancet article says: According to biokinetic modelling (see appendix), the measured activities of ²¹⁰Po of several mBq per sample are compatible with a lethal ingestion of several GBq in 2004.As I noted last year, Arafat's underwear urine stains were measured to have an astounding 180 mBq, over one hundred times the expected amount one would have expected to see in 2012, based on radioactive decay, of a dosage of polonium that would kill a man in a month. Again, not that I am a fan of conspiracy theories, but these results would make sense only if the polonium was planted afterwards. And, as I have noted, there were major irregularities when Arafat's body was exhumed, in that the PLO insisted that Russians be involved in the exhumation, and that only a Palestinian Arab pathologist was allowed to physically take the samples, with no one else observing him. If someone wanted to get advice on how to plant polonium on the samples - as well as polonium itself - Russia would the first choice. Maybe this is why the investigation has been taking so long. If the polonium was planted, the researchers would probably be seeing results that are inconsistent or that otherwise don't make sense. | ||
10/14 Links Pt1: IDF Watching Tunnel For A Year, PA Celebrates Terrorist Murderer of French Tourist Posted: 14 Oct 2013 09:00 AM PDT From Ian: Khaled Abu Toameh: How Jerusalem's Arabs Act Against Their Own Interests Today, many Arabs in Jerusalem are not afraid to declare openly that they prefer to live under Israeli rule, and not under that of the Palestinian Authority or Hamas. The problem remains, however, that the overwhelming majority is still afraid of the radicals.A new type of settlement Privately Palestinian leaders in Mr Abbas's orbit have toyed with admitting that, even if there is a deal with Israel, the refugees and their offspring will never return en masse to their old homes in Israel. With only 60,000 alive (8% of those who fled in 1948), there may soon be almost none left for the Israelis to allow home.Palestinian Suspects Admit to Brutal Murder of IDF Reserve Colonel The Shin Bet, Israel's security service, has arrested two Arabs for the murder of IDF Col. (res.) Sraya Ofer. The attack occurred in the Jordan Valley early this past Friday morning.Netanyahu to Cabinet: 'We Have Witnessed an Increase in Terrorist Actions in Recent Weeks' Addressing the discovery of a tunnel running from the Gaza Strip into Israel, the existence of which the IDF laid blame for on Hamas, Netanyahu said "an aggressive policy against terrorism, including preventive action, intelligence, initiated action, responsive action and, of course, Operation Pillar of Defense" has "led to the fact that this year has been the quietest in over a decade."PA celebrates release of terrorist who killed French tourist Khaled Asakra was one of the 26 prisoners who were released in the first group. Asakra was serving a life sentence for the murder of a 64 year-old French tourist, Annie Ley, whom he stabbed and killed in 1991.Former PA PM rejects Jewish gold medallion discovered near Western Wall An underground walk toward Gaza Edelstein revealed that the IDF had spotted the tunnel from the very beginning of its creation and that through a process requiring "the sort of determination I wish I could detail," had charted its path and exposed it.It keeps tunneling, but Hamas doesn't want escalation… yet Yet make no mistake: Hamas has no interest in initiating a confrontation with Israel. Not right now, that is. On Sunday evening, Hamas's Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh hinted that the Strip's Islamist rulers are not interested in escalation. In a speech to the graduates of a Gaza police officers' course, Haniyeh said his forces are also concerned about Egypt's security, and will guard the border with Sinai. The Hamas prime minister knows that the unequivocal Egyptian demand from his organization and from Haniyeh himself is to avoid any military conflict with Israel, otherwise the Egyptians themselves will act against Hamas.IDF blames Hamas for 'terror tunnel' from Gaza to Israel Maj. Gen. Shlomo Turgeman, the Southern Command head, said the tunnel, "a violation of our sovereignty," had been built using around 500 tons of cement that "Israel allowed in [to Gaza] for civilian well-being." He warned that if Hamas used such a tunnel to carry out a terror attack against Israel, the Israeli response would "leave Gaza looking very different."Hamas: Israel Trying to 'Justify the Blockade' Hamas accused Israel on Sunday of "exaggerating things", after it was made public that IDF soldiers recently discovered a tunnel, built by Gaza terrorists, that led from Gaza to a nearby Israeli community. The 20-meter deep tunnel was lined with the concrete slabs that Israel, giving in to international pressure, had allowed into Gaza to enable the building of schools and other civilian structures.Assad: Loss of chemical weapons is blow to Syria's morale, political standing Syrian President Bashar Assad told a number of guests gathered in his palace in Damascus recently that his country's loss of chemical weapons resulted in a blow to its morale and political position.Key Syrian Rebel Group Turns Down Peace Talks Syrian National Council says it won't attend peace talks in Geneva because the world has "left the murderer unpunished."Red Cross workers kidnapped in Syria A spokesman for the International Committee of the Red Cross in Damascus said seven of the group's workers were kidnapped in northern Syria.Palestinians in Syria 'Eating Cats and Dogs' In his Friday sermon, an imam at the Palestinian Al-Yarmouk camp south of Damascus gave local residents permission to eat dead cats and dogs. The camp has been under siege for three months, the humanitarian situation there has severely deteriorated and the supply of food has not been steady, reports Shalom Toronto.50 Syria Militants Could Return to Wage Jihad in UK, Claims Intelligence Source Up to 50 British jihadists may have returned to the UK to plan terrorist attacks, after receiving weapons training and combat experience in the Syrian civil war.JPost Editorial: Unity against Iran How will the P5+1 react? Inevitably, pressure will build to compromise with the Iranians. Arguments will be made in favor of accepting Iran's proposals and counterarguments will be made against. In the process, a real danger exists that the coalition organized against Iran's nuclear weapons program will fall apart.Iranian sentenced in Azerbaijan for plot on Israeli Embassy An Iranian citizen was sentenced to 15 years in jail in Azerbaijan for planning an attack on the Israeli Embassy in Baku.Morsi's family says he will not compromise with military "The president will not retreat, or negotiate or accept compromises especially after all the martyrs, the wounded, the arrested and missing," his family said in a statement, published on the Muslim Brotherhood's website.US citizen found dead in Egyptian cell An American imprisoned in Egypt was found hanged in his cell Sunday in the city of Ismailiya. Egyptian officials believe that James Henry, 55, committed suicide, AFP reported. His body was found by authorities at noon.Egypt detains 14 for "homosexual acts" at medical centre An Egyptian prosecutor ordered on Saturday that fourteen suspects be detained for four days pending investigations into allegations that they committed "homosexual acts" inside a medical centre in the neighborhood of al-Marg in Cairo. | ||
50 years ago: Arabs emphatically reject peace. (Sound familiar?) Posted: 14 Oct 2013 07:00 AM PDT From the JTA Archives, fifty years ago. September 30, 1963: Rejection of any Israeli call for direct peace talks is a key aspect of unified instructions by Arab governments to their delegations to the current General Assembly of the United Nations, according to a report today in the Jordanian daily newspaper, El Jihad.Also September 30: The first full-scale attack against Israel in this year's General Assembly was voiced at a plenary session of the body this morning by Abdul Monem Rifai of Jordan. Previously, Israel had been attacked on charges of "Zionist colonialism" by the diplomatic spokesmen of Libya, Tunisia and Yemen, but Mr. Rifai devoted a very large section of his address at the Assembly to what he called "the aggression in Palestine."Meaning, that as long as there is a Jewish state, there is no "justice" and peace is impossible. Which is pretty much the same attitude as today, although it is hidden a bit better. Keep in mind that the charges of "colonialism" and "aggression" are being made before 1967. October 9: Saudi Arabia today rejected Israel's calls for peace between Israel and the Arab states. Rashad Pharaon, the new Saudi Arabian representative, replacing Ahmad Shukairy who was dismissed from his UN post by the Saudi Arabian Government a year ago, addressed the plenary session of the General Assembly. [Shukairy, of course, became head of the PLO soon afterwards. - EoZ]Notice that no one calls anyone "Palestinians." 15 years after Israel was reborn, the word "Palestinian" was still highly associated with Jews, so the Arab countries referred to "Arabs of Palestine." More history from October 1963 coming tomorrow, as we explore how Israel engaged in "X-washing" even before there was any "occupation." | ||
Stunning photos of the Hamas terror tunnel, plus video Posted: 14 Oct 2013 05:00 AM PDT From Buzzfeed: Hamas military spokesman in Gaza, Abu Obeida, said on his official Twitter account that "thousands" more tunnels would be dug out.
The IDF estimated over 500 tons of concrete were used to build this. Israel has now suspended shipping construction materials to Gaza. You can be sure that "human rights" organizations will be condemning that ban on concrete far more than the Hamas attempt to kidnap Israelis. Here's video: (h/t Yoel) | ||
A legal scholar details ICRC bias against Israel over "occupation" of Gaza Posted: 14 Oct 2013 02:00 AM PDT Last week I wrote a post about how the International Committee of the Red Cross was, in my opinion, hypocritical for ignoring the opinions of experts it gathered to discuss the definition of "occupation" and choosing instead to consider Gaza to still be occupied, against all normative legal opinions. I received two responses from Juan-Pedro Schaerer, ICRC Head of Delegation, Israel and the Occupied Territories, in the comments. The first one: While this article provides a summary of an important expert's workshop, the author ignores essential facts used by the ICRC when applying of the Law of Occupation to Gaza. And a second one, after I commented: In response to your comments and for the purpose of clarification, I wish to emphasize that the ICRC does not maintain that Israel has retained all elements of authority and governmental functions in Gaza. Rather, our position is that even after the withdrawal of its forces in 2005 Israel continues to exercise effective control over certain key elements of authority in Gaza and therefore remains bound by obligations under the law of occupation within the territorial and functional limits of the competences it has retained. This reflects a functional approach to the law of occupation that emanates from the underlying purpose and rationale of that body of law. In simplified terms it means that to the extent that an occupying power retains control of key functions and authorities in the occupied territory it also remains bound by the relevant provisions of the law of occupation. Where there is control there is responsibility. For an elaboration on this see T. Ferraro, Determining the beginning and end of an occupation under international humanitarian law, 94 IRRC 133, 159 (aviliable online here:) Professor Abraham (Avi) Bell, of the University of San Diego School of Law and at Bar-Ilan University, an expert on international law who has written extensively on this very issue, graciously offered to comment on Schaerer's responses. His answer is much better than the one I planned to write. (Emphasis mine.) The argument first used by Mr. Schaerer was taken near verbatim from one invented by Gisha, a political pro-Palestinian NGO. It is not an argument that has any basis in general international law. Mr. Schaerer's argument consisted of a list of factual assertions, some of which are obviously correct but irrelevant (yes, Israel controls Israel's own land borders with Gaza), and some of which are obviously both false and irrelevant (no, Israel does not "control … all the items that can be imported and exported from the Strip" – Gaza imports and exports goods through its land borders with Egypt). None of the factual assertions relate to the generally understood legal criteria for effective control as understood in international law, as ICRC officials would readily acknowledge if Israel were not in the dock. Is there any other case in recorded history where the "facts" offered by Mr. Schaerer have been interpreted as sufficient "effective control" to create a belligerent occupation notwithstanding the absence of (1) boots on the ground and (2) any administration by the purported "occupier"? The answer, of course, is no. It is curious that Mr. Schaerer didn't even try to analyze how the generally applicable test for belligerent occupation would apply to Israel and Gaza. Instead, he said that a set of irrelevant facts "allow ICRC to determine that Israel exercises effective control." Well, sure. ICRC is "allowed" to make any determination it wants. It is "allowed" to determine Spain occupies Portugal, if it wants. Mr. Schaerer's "clarification" is even more mystifying. He appears to be saying that the ICRC acknowledges that Gaza is not occupied by Israel, but that the ICRC claims that Israel can still be bound by some of the rules of belligerent occupation due to legally insufficient effective control. This is a novel theory that was advanced by Gisha after its earlier arguments that Israel "occupies" Gaza found no support among legal scholars not pre-committed to the Palestinian side. Needless to say, Gisha's new theory has no basis in the text of any treaties, and it has never been applied against any other country in recorded history. In other words, it is a brand-new anti-Israel theory aimed to create legal duties that restrict the conduct of the Jewish state, but not of any other state in the world. There are several additional oddities in Mr. Schaerer's clarification. First, it is a lie. The ICRC continues to treat Gaza as belligerently occupied territory (see, e.g., here.) I cannot find a single public statement of the ICRC that acknowledges that Gaza is not actually belligerently occupied by Israel, but rather that Israel is bound by some laws of occupation under the "functional" theory even though Gaza is not occupied. Even Mr. Schaerer's fails to acknowledge this openly in his "clarification." Instead, Schaerer's characterizes the ICRC position in a disingenuous manner. Schaerer claims that the ICRC restricts itself to asserting that "Israel ... remains bound by obligations under the law of occupation within the territorial and functional limits of the competences it has retained." This is, of course, a flat-out lie. The ICRC continues to assert that Israel is bound by the law of occupation well beyond any "functional limits of the competences [Israel] has retained." For instance, the ICRC continues to blame Israel for the failures of Hamas' health care system in Gaza, the lack of variety of goods exported from Egypt to Gaza, and numerous other "competences" that have nothing to do with Israel. Second, not only does Mr. Schaerer refuse to acknowledge the nature of the new theory he is advancing, he pretends that it is existing and well-known international law. The disingenuousness of Mr. Schaerer's claims on this score can be seen by looking at his citation of an article by an ICRC advisor that Mr. Schaerer claims supports the bizarre anti-Israel theory used by the ICRC. The article is written by a senior legal advisor at the ICRC, so it naturally attempts to support the ICRC's position. But ironically, the article does little more than show just how baseless the ICRC's anti-Israel position is. Mr. Schaerer claims the article shows that "[w]here there is control there is responsibility" and Israel has "control" according to the ICRC, and it must therefore have responsibility. But the article actually says quite the opposite. According to the article, the general understanding of international law when not distorted to attack the Jewish state is that a state only has control if three ingredients are present at the same time: (1) the armed forces of the occupying state are physically present in a foreign territory without the consent of the local government; (2) the effective local government has been or can be rendered substantially incapable of exerting its powers by virtue of the foreign forces' unconsented-to presence; and (3) the foreign forces are in a position to exercise authority over the territory concerned (or parts thereof) in lieu of the local government. As it happens, exactly ZERO of these ingredients are present in Gaza. In other words, the article cited as authoritative by Schaerer shows just the opposite of what he claims. Of course, the article is produced by an ICRC lackey, and it attempts to fabricate a new legal theory that can justify the ICRC's position against the Jewish state. Thus the article offers for unnamed "specific and exceptional cases" the "functional theory" that Mr. Schaerer uses to try to impose legal duties on Israel to support Hamas's rule in Gaza. But the article does not even try to claim that there has ever been such a specific and exceptional case in recorded history. In fact, the article introduces its discussion of the "functional theory" by contrasting it with existing law, making it clear that even the article's author cannot seriously claim that the ICRC's anti-Israel position reflects international law as it currently stands. Instead, the article offers the "functional theory" as an innovation for which the article cites not a single legal authority nor any legal precedent. However, I should acknowledge that Mr. Schaerer is right in saying that it is "facile" to accuse the ICRC of hypocrisy. We do not have any clear evidence of the ICRC officials' motivation in distorting legal standards to create a uniquely harsh anti-Israel standard. The only things that can be clearly demonstrated are that the ICRC is using a harsher standard against Jewish state than it has used against any other country in recorded history, that its anti-Israel standard has no basis in international law as it is currently understood and applied, and that ICRC employees advocate the ICRC's anti-Israel position by means of falsehoods and disingenuous argumentation. Until an ICRC employee is willing to be more forthcoming, the reasons for the ICRC's bias against the world's only Jewish state will remain a mystery. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה