יום שישי, 2 בספטמבר 2022

Daily EoZ Digest

UN Security Council condemns Hezbollah - but refuses to mention Hezbollahnoreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 02 Sep 04:45 AM From UNIFIL: (Resolution 26

Like   Tweet  
eozlogo2

UN Security Council condemns Hezbollah - but refuses to mention Hezbollah
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 02 Sep 04:45 AM

From UNIFIL:

(Resolution 2650 of) the Security Council requests the LAF and the UN Secretary General set out precise benchmarks and timelines for the effective and durable deployment of the Lebanese Armed Forces in southern Lebanon and in the country's territorial waters. ...

The Council reiterates that UNIFIL does not require prior authorization or permission from anyone to undertake its mandated tasks, and that it is allowed to conduct its operations independently. It calls on the parties to guarantee UNIFIL's freedom of movement, including by allowing announced and unannounced patrols. The Council condemns the harassment and intimidation of UNIFIL personnel, as well as the use of disinformation campaigns against peacekeepers. It further requests the mission to take measures to monitor and counter disinformation.

The Council also expresses concern in the resolution about some developments along the Blue Line. It notes the recent installation of containers that restrict peacekeepers' access to, or ability to see, parts of the line. It also condemns the presence of unauthorized weapons controlled by armed groups in UNIFIL's area of operations.

That last sentence is a condemnation of Hezbollah by the UN Security Council. But it refuses to name Hezbollah!
That is cowardly. While it is obvious that this resolution is meant to condemn Hezbollah, by not saying their name, they are...Read More

09/01 Links Pt2: Amnesty International - Hypocrisy and Double Standards; Closet Zionist? Linda Sarsour's On the Down Low Visit to Israel
noreply@blogger.com (Ian), 01 Sep 05:00 PM

From Ian:

Amb. Alan Baker: Amnesty International - Hypocrisy and Double Standards

In the context of the ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Amnesty International (AI) recently issued a report, dated August 4, 2022, entitled "Ukrainian Fighting Tactics Endanger Civilians."1 This report names Ukraine responsible for the deaths of Ukrainian citizens caused by Russian bombardments. The report accuses Ukraine of violating international humanitarian law and endangering its own civilians "by establishing bases and operating weapons systems in populated residential areas, including in schools and hospitals…" and thereby turning civilian objects into military targets, generating Russian strikes in populated areas thereby causing civilian fatalities and destruction of civilian infrastructure."

There can be no doubt as to the centrality and essential nature of those humanitarian requirements set out in the internationally accepted and recognized instruments of international humanitarian law, requiring the protection of civilians and avoidance of military attacks against civilian concentrations and objects. Such instruments include the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Geneva, 12 August 1949,3 and the Protocol Additional relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.

To maintain credibility...Read More

Cartoon of the Day: The Iran deal - it is all relative
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 01 Sep 03:00 PM

* * *

* * *

Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.

Read all about it here!

...Read More

All Culture To Be Transformed Into Amorphous Blobs To Avoid Offending, Triggering (PreOccupied Territory)
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 01 Sep 01:30 PM

Our weekly column from the humor site PreOccupied Territory.

Check out their Facebook page.

New York, September 1 - Museums, schools, libraries, and other repositories of the collective wisdom and artistic-intellectual output of the preceding generations have embarked on a program to render all such materials into indistinct, vague masses lest anyone experience negative emotional responses to an encounter with anything resembling an assertion.

Leading cultural institutions resolved this week to protect the fragile psyches of humans by turning all textual, visual, tactile, and acoustic media into blobs of undiscernible nothingness, in keeping with the burgeoning trend of avoiding offense wherever and however possible. Representatives of the institutions announced the initiative following an incident last week in which a visitor to the Metropolitan Museum of Art called all attempts to examine, study, learn from, analyze, or explain anything that came from another culture "exploitation" and "appropriation." The complaint prompted museum officials and colleagues throughout the cultural and academic world to "do better" by removing all content that could insult, or be interpreted to insult, marginalized communities.

"Our entire collection or objets d'art excludes the visually-impaired," observed Neffer Gudenov, a curator at the Met. "So we're going...Read More

09/01 Links Pt1: Col. Kemp: A Deal Based on Lies: The Iran Nuclear Agreement Will Make War More Likely; Iran deal bashed in letter to Biden from 5,000 Israeli security experts
noreply@blogger.com (Ian), 01 Sep 11:00 AM

From Ian:

Col. Richard Kemp: A Deal Based on Lies: The Iran Nuclear Agreement Will Make War More Likely

Iran has been waging war non-stop on the West and its allies in the Middle East since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Appeasing Tehran by endorsing its nuclear program and handing it billions of dollars from sanctions relief will empower and encourage the ayatollahs to even greater aggression.

The mantra of the apologists for President Biden's attempt to revive President Obama's failed agreement from 2015 that paved the way to an Iranian nuclear bomb is "a bad deal is better than no deal." Well, no, it is not. The argument is that it buys time for the West, with optimism that "something will turn up." But optimism is not a strategy and certainly not for dealing with a violent revolutionary regime dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state, which it sees as the proxy of its ultimate enemy, America.

The "buying time" argument only works if you do not understand Iran and are naive enough to believe the regime will honor what it agrees to. The reality is that the regime in Tehran will ignore constraints imposed by the deal that it does not like. That is what it did with the original JCPOA and its other international undertakings including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that it has frequently breached.

Tehran will continue to develop its nuclear capability - deal or no deal - at the speed...Read More

Jared Kushner reveals why Trump was turned off by Abbas
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 01 Sep 09:00 AM


CNN Arabic quotes an episode in Jared Kushner's book Breaking History that I couldn't find in any English-language articles. The quotes are obviously translated from English to Arabic and back, so they will not be exact quotes from the book.

The President was scheduled to meet with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, in the West Bank. Abbas came to the White House in May, told the president he was ready to negotiate, and expressed confidence in Trump as an arbiter of a peace agreement between the Palestinians and Israel. We were impressed, but we were still waiting to hear more. Just before we left, Ambassador Friedman showed Trump a video of Abbas making serious threats towards the Israeli people.

Friedman's message was clear: Be careful with Abbas - he tells you he's for peace in English, but look carefully at what he says in Arabic. Tillerson saw what was happening in the video and got angry, claiming he was dishonest. Friedman replied: ' Are you saying he didn't say these things?' Tillerson had to admit that they were Abbas's words, but he was angry that he was losing control. It was important for the president to see all sides of the issue, especially since he was hearing from so many respectable businessmen that Abbas was a serious man who genuinely wanted to make peace.

During the bilateral meeting in Ramallah, Abbas recited the same talking...Read More

Roger Waters opposes "occupation" - except when he supports it. A real mystery.
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 01 Sep 07:00 AM

Israel-hater and antisemite Roger Waters is in the midst of a North American tour. The Times of Israel writes about the concert and the protesters outside his New York show on Tuesday.

Waters puts political messages on a massive screen, and among them are messages about how awful "occupation" is.

Waters became a spokesperson for BDS in 2011, so it is safe to say that he held these opinions for over a decade.
Moreover, Waters has said that any artists performing in Israel endorse the Israeli government.
If all that is true, then how come he performed Pink Floyd's "The Wall" in 2013 - in Istanbul, Turkey? You know, the country that occupies part of Cyprus?
Waters, in his own words, must endorse the Turkish occupation of Northern Cyprus.
Which means Roger Waters, human rights activist, endorses occupation.
And indeed he does. After all, Roger Waters has said that...Read More

blogger facebook twitter
1px
 

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה