יום ראשון, 23 באוקטובר 2022

Daily EoZ Digest

Without evidence, Palestinians warn Jews want to build a synagogue in Qattanin Marketnoreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 23 Oct 04:45 AM Lately, Palestin

Like   Tweet  
eozlogo2

Without evidence, Palestinians warn Jews want to build a synagogue in Qattanin Market
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 23 Oct 04:45 AM

Lately, Palestinian media have been warning that Israel plans to convert the famous Qattanin (Cotton) market, adjacent to the Temple Mount, into a synagogue.
Apparently, Jews went to pray there during Sukkot and to avoid friction the Jerusalem authorities closed the stores in the market for several morning hours. (Arab media say that their lulavim and etrogim were "vegetable offerings.")
Different "experts" have come to the same conclusion, all without pointing to any evidence.
Palinfo says: "Al-Maqdisi researcher Radwan Amr said, in a press statement, that the occupation and settlement groups are working to transform the Qattanin Market into a roofed synagogue."
Felesteen says, "The occupation is trying to convert it into a synagogue, according to the head of the Jerusalem Committee against Judaization Nasser Al-Hidmi."
Masa News says, "The researcher in Jerusalem affairs, Fakhri Abu Diab, told Safa news agency that the occupation and the alleged temple groups are keeping their eyes on the Qattanin market, as it is the closest to Al-Aqsa Mosque and a main view of the...Read More

10/22 Links: Yair Rosenberg: How to Learn About Jews From Jews, Rather Than the People Who Hate Them; Anne Bayefsky: The UN gives a master class in anti-Semitism
noreply@blogger.com (Ian), 22 Oct 06:30 PM

From Ian:

Yair Rosenberg: How to Learn About Jews From Jews, Rather Than the People Who Hate Them

Jews make up 2 percent of the American population, and just 0.2 percent of the world population. In practice, this means that most people have never met one. What the average person knows of Jews, they know from received cultural stereotypes, television, and the internet. The consequences of this are regularly evident in our public discourse, where ignorant and ill-intentioned ideas about Jews abound. That's why this newsletter has spent the last three weeks covering anti-Semitism—from the Ivy League to Kanye West—and could easily continue doing so this week. But focusing on the negative ways that outsiders misrepresent Jews has the unfortunate effect of shrinking the Jewish experience to the hampered horizons of their haters. In actuality, Jews are a proud and diverse people who have thrived for millennia, and whose collective experience is far richer than simply surviving oppression. When we view Jewish existence through the lens of anti-Jewish prejudice, we lose the very elements of it that have enabled the tradition to repeatedly overcome efforts to stifle it.

So this week, instead of responding to the latest anti-Jewish outrage, I want to offer an eclectic introduction to Jews and Judaism through writings, art, and culture produced by Jews themselves...Read More

10/21 Links Pt2: Phillips: Antisemitism and Israel-bashing are one and the same; Hijacked: The Capture of America's Middle East Studies Centers
noreply@blogger.com (Ian), 21 Oct 04:00 PM

From Ian:

Melanie Phillips: Antisemitism and Israel-bashing are one and the same

Those trying to defend the Jewish people from the tsunami of Jew-hatred swamping the West often face an implacable refusal to acknowledge that anti-Israel or anti-Zionist attitudes are the modern iteration of antisemitism.

It's claimed instead that Israel's defenders are trying to silence criticism of what Israel does, just like any other country would be criticized.

But Israel isn't criticized like any other country. It is instead subjected to obsessive libels, double standards and scapegoating for crimes of which it is not only innocent but is in fact the victim – all unique characteristics of antisemitism.

This lethal myopia now stretches from Australia to a London theater.

Four years ago, a conservative Australian government announced that it recognized "West Jerusalem" as Israel's capital. This week, Australia's current Labor government reversed that decision – and declared that Israel's capital is Tel Aviv.

Despite the claims made to the contrary by foes and false friends alike, Israel is legally, historically and morally entitled to Jerusalem. What's more, the patent absurdity of declaring that Tel Aviv is Israel's capital was exceeded only by its arrogance.

A sovereign country decides for itself where to situate its capital. No one else can decide that its capital is actually another...Read More

Elder Comix: When the Left realizes that they hate most Jews
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 21 Oct 01:53 PM


Inspired by this.

* * *

* * *

Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.

Read all about it here!

...Read More

10/21 Links Pt1: Lapid: UN's CIO report is antisemitic and written by antisemites; Iran testing drones on Ukrainian civilians for future use on Israel
noreply@blogger.com (Ian), 21 Oct 11:00 AM

From Ian:

Caroline Glick: Yair Lapid, Authoritarian and Unafraid

Under Israel's constitutional law Basic Law – Referendums, to come into force all international agreements that involve the concession of sovereign territory require the approval of two-thirds of the Knesset or must pass in a public referendum. Since Lapid's deal involves the concession of Israel's territorial waters, under both the spirit and letter of the law, Lapid is supposed to submit the deal to the Knesset for two-thirds approval. In the event, Lapid tried to avoid even presenting the agreement to the Knesset for review. Although Attorney General Gali Miara Baharav issued an opinion that the agreement doesn't need to be considered under the Basic Law – Referendums (for reasons that aren't clear), she still insisted that the Knesset must approve the deal by a simple majority.

Lapid, for his part, doesn't care what his attorney general thinks or what the law says. In response to a reporter's question at the press conference, Lapid explained how he justifies his decision to act in clear contempt of the law and his attorney general and suffice with government approval of his radical deal with Hezbollah's stand-in government in Beirut.

As he put it, "In light of the opposition's unrestrained behavior, we have decided not to bring the agreement before the Knesset for a vote."

That is, given that his political opponents oppose a...Read More

Jordan freaks out over Dutch diplomat's minor rebuke of press freedoms in the kingdom
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 21 Oct 09:20 AM

The Dutch ambassador to Jordan tweeted, "Pleasure meeting HE Minister of Media AlShubol. An opportunity to discuss issues of common concern, including the media scene in Jordan. Stressed our strong bilateral relationship, and I shared our concerns on Jordan's declining international ranking on freedom of speech. Netherlands ready for cooperation."
Jordan ranks 129th out of 180 nations in press freedom, and as I have noted often, even though it has control over the media it allows virulently antisemitic material to be published daily.

Jordan and Jordanians are very unhappy at this very mild rebuke.

Jordan's government has criticised the Dutch ambassador to Amman after he made comments about media freedom in the kingdom.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates said that Harry Verweij had weighed into domestic affairs during a courtesy meeting with a senior official.

His comments included the licensing of a local radio station and who ran it, according to the ministry, which did not elaborate further...Read More

The UN Commission of Inquiry's footnotes betray how they lie
noreply@blogger.com (Unknown), 21 Oct 07:00 AM

It happens again and again. A major institution, whether the UN, Amnesty or HRW, issues a report that asserts what it considers facts, it refers to a footnoted publication, and the footnote proves that they are lying.
Here is an example from the latest UN Commission of Inquiry report. It finds that Israel's "occupation" is unlawful under international law. It says:
The occupation of territory in wartime is, under international humanitarian law, a temporary situation, which deprives the occupied Power of neither its statehood nor its sovereignty. Occupation as a result of war cannot imply any right whatsoever to dispose of territory.The footnote to this points to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), commentary of 1958 on article 47 of the Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.
The wording of that commentary makes it clear that Israel is not occupying "Palestinian territory" which is the linchpin of the entire argument.
It says:
This provision of the Hague Regulations is not applicable only to the inhabitants of the occupied territory; it also protects the separate existence of the State, its institutions and its laws. ...As was emphasized in the commentary...Read More

blogger facebook twitter
1px
 

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה