יום שלישי, 27 בנובמבר 2012

Elder of Ziyon Daily News

Elder of Ziyon Daily News

Link to Elder of Ziyon

The UN really, really wants to reward Hamas aggression

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 06:38 PM PST

Robert Serry, the UN envoy to the Middle East, proves yet again what a complete waste of space the UN is.

In this case, he is doing everything he can to pretend that Hamas is a moderate, peace-loving group:

The United Nations envoy to the Middle East acknowledged in an interview with McClatchy Sunday that he has maintained quiet contacts with the Islamist group Hamas for "years," despite the international community's official policy to isolate the group.

Robert Serry described his office's contacts with Hamas, which has ruled the Gaza Strip since 2007, as "quiet engagements"...

"Because we are on the ground we have our informal contacts with Hamas. How could we not?" he said. "We also have our quiet engagements with Hamas to work for a calm. In the last years I have been working to pass on messages to Hamas."

Officially, the international community has no direct contact with Hamas. The U.N., the United States and other Western governments formally renounced any dialogue with Hamas after the Islamist group, which has never acknowledged Israel's right to exist, won Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006.

In a statement that year, then-U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan said that the international community would only accept Hamas if it showed, "a commitment to the principles of non-violence, recognition of Israel and the acceptance of previous agreements and obligations."
Everyone knows that Hamas rules Gaza and that some level of indirect communications must be maintained. Even Israel must communicate with Hamas. But Serry is obviously granting this interview in order to push the idea that the UN should publicly meet with Hamas, and that Hamas shoul dbe mainstreamed as a virtual state, effectively rewarding Hamas for firing over 1400 rockets into civilian areas of Israel.

Serry then goes off into fantasyland:

Serry noted that Hamas has still not met the U.N.'s demands that it recognize Israel and renounce violence. But he said that Hamas officials have recently made statements suggesting that they were willing to moderate their position on some key points.

In an interview this weekend with CNN, Hamas political head Khaled Mashaal said that his group was willing to accept a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders, "or 22 percent of 'historical Palestine.'"

He also suggested that his group would be willing to recognize Israel once progress was made toward the establishment of an independent Palestinian State.
If you actually read the transcript of the interview, Meshal says:
CNN: you say that you would accept a two-state solution, but that you will not recognize Israel's right to exist.

Is that still the case?

MESHAL: ... I accept a Palestinian state according to 1967 borders with Jerusalem as the capital, with the right to return.

...The resistance is not a goal. The resistance is a means to an end. The end game is to end occupation but the international community is not enabling us to do this. They are biased toward Israel.

[NOTE: I have proven many times that Hamas calls all of Israel '"occupied,"so when he says the end goal is the end of occupation he means it is the end of Israel. CNN's Amanpour, of course, is too dense to know this.]

...Palestine, from the river to the sea, from the north to the south, it is my land. And the land of my fathers and grandfathers, inhibited by the Palestinians from a long time ago. This is my land, my right.

But because of the circumstances of the region, because of the keenness (ph) to stop the bloodshed, the Palestinians today, and in the past, and Hamas, have agreed about a program, a (INAUDIBLE) program that accepts the '67 borders. But the Israelis don't accept. So it is all about - up to the Israelis.
Nowhere does Meshal say or imply that he would ever recognize Israel. He says, explicitly, that the "1967 borders" are the initial goal, the "right of return" is not negotiable to destroy Israel demographically, and even then he says nothing about recognizing Israel afterwards, with the unspoken assumption that the two Palestines would end up combining (and, eventually according to the Hamas charter, become part of a larger Islamic 'ummah that excludes any Jewish nationalism.)

Meshal throws around words like "peace" but it is obvious he means a world without Israel. Yet Robert Serry, who knows all of this, is working overtime to humanize the Hamas terrorists and to pretend that their idea of peace is similar to what most Westerners say peace means.

One other thing. Meshal didn't say anything about "22% of historical Palestine." This is a standard Palestinan Arab talking point, one that obviously Serry has adopted as the truth so much so that he uses the phrase on his own.

And it is also a complete lie.

Robert Serry shows in this interview that the UN is bending over backwards to reward Hamas - and to accept easily proven lies, as long as they are against Israel.


Monday links

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 01:30 PM PST

From Ian:

Pat Condell: Peace in the Middle East VIDEO



JPost editorial: Palestinian reality
"Until the Palestinian people decide to switch their energies from blind hatred for Israel and the West to self-advancement and self-determination; until Palestinian leaders give up violence and unilateral diplomacy and inspire their people with a vision of peace, prosperity and reconciliation – an end to the conflict will remain unattainable."

Family reunification? Not in Israel
Of all the Arabs involved in terror attacks during the Second Intifada, 25 had better access to their targets as Israeli citizens, thanks to the family reunification law.

Barry Rubin: Who won in Gaza?
One might better conclude that Hamas set back this timetable by showing its Egyptian sponsor that it was not a good team player.

Is Abbas About To Join Hamas? by Khaled Abu Toameh
"Obviously, Abbas has now changed his policy and Hamas is no longer a threat to him and his regime. Now he will have to stop arresting -- and torturing -- Hamas members in the West Bank in the hope that the Islamist movement will forgive him for "collaborating" with Israel.
It now remains to be seen whether Hamas will forgive Abbas for his "sins," and join forces with him."

PA to Release Hamas Prisoners in 'Goodwill Gesture'
The Palestinian Authority will release Hamas-affiliated detainees and allow Hamas to attend PLO meetings in Judea and Samaria.
Hamas to free Fatah prisoners in Gaza (from Joe in Aust)

The Middle East for Expert Dummies
"But Zakaria hasn't noticed any of it. Instead, he and other liberal "experts" continue to blame Israel for the fact that the Palestinians can't take yes for an answer. Part of the reason for this is the delusion that someday the West will hand Israel over to them on a silver platter. Rather than writing about the need for a sea change in Palestinian political culture that will make peace possible, Zakaria blames the Israelis for paying attention to the history of the last 20 years. Too bad such a basic skill isn't required to make a person a mainstream media foreign policy expert."

Netanyahu to Pilots: If Quiet is Not Kept You Will Return to Hitting Remnant of Hamas Weapons Stockpile

IDF Chief Assures 'Quiet Will Last – Or Else'
IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz assured Israelis on Sunday there would be no more rocket fire from Gaza – "or else."

New air defense system shoots down missile in first test
David's Sling weapon system, with range of 70-200 kilometers, complements Iron Dome and will provide shield against Hezbollah's arsenal

Hamas to Investigate Executions of 'Collaborators'
Hamas will establish a committee to investigate the execution without trial of seven Gazans during Operation Pillar of Defense.

New baby names in Gaza: 'Fajr' and 'Ahmed Jabari'
Gazans commemorate Operation Pillar of Defense by naming babies after long-range missiles, Hamas military commander

PMW: Hamas spokesman: We are not afraid of Israel because we love death VIDEO



Iran Tries to Choke Israel with Free Oil Offer to Jordan
Iran is trying to surround Israel on three sides with its "axis of evil" by offering free oil to Jordan.

Canadians, Americans say world can't tolerate nuclear-capable Iran: Poll
"Nine out of ten people polled in both countries said they agreed with the statement "the world cannot tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons capability," according to an Ipsos Reid survey conducted on behalf of The Munk Debates. Just over 2,000 Canadians and Americans were polled."

MEMRI: Iranian Blogger Who Told Supreme Leader Khamenei 'Your Judicial System... Is Nothing But A Slaughterhouse'
Tortured To Death In Prison

Syrian rebels capture air base, Palestinian training camp
"At least 8 children dead after regime's warplanes bombard village outside Damascus
It said rebels on Sunday captured a training base for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command near the Damascus suburb of Douma. The PFLP-GC is one of the Palestinian factions most loyal to Assad."

For Syria's new opposition head, Zionism is 'a cancerous movement'
Mouaz al-Khatib, widely seen as a moderate religious figure, also praised Saddam Hussein for 'terrifying the Jews'

Radio host calls Montreal Jewish population 'annoying'
Anti-semitic comments on late-night Quebec talk show
"She started by criticizing Israel for last week's bombings. Then she began to attack Jewish people and even lauded the Holocaust.
Fabi did not interrupt the woman, but continued the conversation and sympathized with her statements. "

Irish Pro-PA Protesters Hurl Eggs at Israeli Envoy
Pro-Palestinian Authority protesters interrupted a pro-Israel rally in Dublin on Sunday, and eggs were thrown at the Israeli ambassador.

Anti-Israel Protesters 'Occupy' Roof of Scottish Parliament
Anti-Israel protesters, who sought to "occupy" the roof of Scottish parliament, have been charged by police.

Low on funds and state protection, Europe's Jews remain vulnerable
Facing constant threats and limited resources, communities across the continent are struggling to provide their own security

A bright moment in Hungary
"It therefore became particularly urgent for Israel's supporters to show that the overwhelming majority of concerned public opinion in Hungary fully supported the Jewish state and its right to self-defense. That goal was achieved this past Thursday afternoon at a beautiful event organized by the Jewish community and the Faith Church. Close to approximately three thousand Hungarian citizens of different faiths came together, including some from outside Budapest, to show support for Israel and to express their outrage at the attacks from Gaza on Israeli civilian targets."

Suddenly, a life in green
Alon, who spoke to The Times of Israel one day after being called up, documented his week of reserves, on the cusp of war in Gaza
"Today, we are all at home and I have returned to my simple life as a video editor. There was no war to fight. I am thankful for that. But I remain with the uncertainty, the unknowing of where I might spend tomorrow night and the swirling sense of what might, yet again, be asked of me."


Also:

TOI: Cease-fire, but control the agenda

Free Beacon: NYT reporter falls for Hamas ploy

ABC: Historic Jewish Cemetery in Caribbean Fades Away

Edgar Davidson on What passes for 'expert' Israel coverage in the Jewish Chronicle and
The Evening Standard Continues its Blood Libel against Israel

Woman single-handedly drives terrorist away from family


(h/t Marten)


Two Hamas music videos extol killing Jews (updated)

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 12:00 PM PST

UPDATE: First read this absurd piece of drivel by Ed Husain at CNN from last week. Money quote::

To demand that Hamas abandon violence, change its charter, or recognize Israel is not the beginning, but should be the end results of a peace process that builds trust over a period of time.

Now, watch these from Palestinian Media Watch:

"We kidnap soldiers and kill Jews" - Hamas music VIDEO




"Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah" - Hamas music VIDEO



This last one only calls for Israel to be destroyed. So it must be proof of Hamas' moderation.



Now do you understand that Hamas actions are all Israel's fault?


Using war as a cover to target journalists, or journalists as a cover for waging war?

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 10:10 AM PST

David Carr in The New York Times has a go at anti-Israel slander:
Three employees of news organizations were killed in Gaza by Israeli missiles. Rather than suggesting it was a mistake, or denying responsibility, an Israeli Defense Forces spokeswoman, Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich, told The Associated Press, "The targets are people who have relevance to terror activity."

So it has come to this: killing members of the news media can be justified by a phrase as amorphous as "relevance to terror activity."

The good news is that, unlike in 2008, foreign correspondents were allowed to enter Gaza and see for themselves. The bad news is that they were entering a place where some journalists already there were considered targets, making a dangerous situation all the more so.

Mahmoud al-Kumi and Hussam Salama worked as cameramen for Al-Aqsa TV, which is run by Hamas and whose reporting frequently reflects that affiliation. They were covering events in central Gaza when a missile struck their car, which, according to Al-Aqsa, was clearly marked with the letters "TV." (The car just in front of them was carrying a translator and driver for The New York Times, so the execution hit close to our organization.) And Mohamed Abu Aisha, director of the private Al-Quds Educational Radio, was also in a car when it was hit by a missile.

A distinction needs to be made. The battle over ideas — over who owns the truth in a given conflict — should be fought with notebooks and video cameras, not weapons of war.

...The more important principle at work is whether governments in the Middle East and elsewhere will succeed in shaping or silencing different points of view by training missiles and bullets on journalists. If they do, the battle for the truth will disappear into the fog of war.
Carr is making a really sickening assumption: that when the IDF targets so-called "journalists" that they are trying to stifle the free exchange of ideas. It doesn't even cross his mind that the "journalists" themselves are actually militants.

In the case of Mohamed Abu Aisha, he clearly was a uniform-wearing member of Islamic Jihad:

Islamic Jihad doesn't describe him as a journalist, but as an instructor for the Mujahideen of Al-Quds Brigades in Deir al-Balah Battalion Brigade.

Similarly, Hamas message boards refer to Hussam Salama as a "mujahid." That is not a word used to describe civilians.

I can understand how journalists may be sensitive to others who are purportedly of their profession being targeted. But Israel was clearly aiming at terrorists, not at "journalists." Carr's dismissive attitude - and his very biased assumption that the IDF's message really meant that the army was targeting those whose opinions it disagrees with - is quite reprehensible.

It is also notable that Carr, supposedly so sensitive to the safety of journalists, cannot find a bad word to say about terrorist organizations who were clearly using the building housing journalists in order to try to shield themselves from attack. Apparently, that is not worth a comment from this defender of journalists. I wonder why?

It is also important to understand that the broadcasts of terror organizations are not considered protected under international law. As NGO Monitor notes:

Under international law, there is no restriction on targeting communications infrastructure that are part of the "military command and control system" or that because of their "nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose partial or total destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage." These include "the installations of broadcasting and television stations of fundamental military importance as military objectives."

In an analogous case, the prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia found that NATO's targeting of Serbian Television was legal during the 1999 operation in Kosovo:

Insofar as the attack actually was aimed at disrupting the communications network, it was legally acceptable ... NATO's targeting of the RTS building for propaganda purposes was an incidental (albeit complementary) aim of its primary goal of disabling the Serbian military command and control system and to destroy the nerve system and apparatus that keeps Milosević in power

Moreover, under international law, there is no international legal protection for incitement to violence or hate speech. Most countries have laws criminalizing this speech. The Nuremberg Tribunals found that incitement can constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. Article III(b) of the Convention Against Genocide criminalizes "direct and public incitement to commit genocide and several people were prosecuted at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda on the basis of using the media for incitement and hate speech.

Are these media outlets in fact part of the military apparatus of the terror groups? Today, Gaza prime minister Ismail Haniyeh answered this with a resounding "yes," characterizing the Hamas media as "Fedayeen (commandoes) of truth." He never says that he considers them as independent; he considers them soldiers. While this in itself is probably not enough to target the terrorist "reporters" themselves, it shows how Hamas and Islamic Jihad use the profession of journalism as a cover for their own terror aims.

Again, David Carr does not seem to be so bothered by this perversion of the profession he pretends to be defending in this piece.

No, his vitriol is only against the nation who sees through the lies and tries to defend itself from people practicing the war crime of perfidy. It is a shame that this job isn't being done by real journalists who should be spending their time uncovering the truth rather than running interference for those who use their profession so cynically.

(h/t CHA)


Terrorists using machismo to compensate for their fear

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 09:00 AM PST

Chief Lebanese terrorist Hassan Nasrallah betrays his fears - and overcompensates for them by using bluster and threats:



As reported by Ya Libnan:
Nasrallah warned Israel that any Israeli attack against Lebanon would be met with far-reaching retribution.

"How will Israel, which was shaken by a small number of [Palestinian] rockets, be able to sustain the thousands of rockets that will be launched over Tel Aviv and other cities, in the event of an attack against Lebanon?" Nasrallah asked.

He was referring to the war in Gaza during which Hamas fired hundreds of rockets including the Iranian made al Fajr rockets which reached as far as Jerusalem and Tel Aviv .
But this threat was meant to cover up his fear, as shown elsewhere in his speech:

Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah warned the Arab countries during the commemoration of the Shiite holy day, the Day of Ashura , against "befriending" Israel and regarding Iran "as an enemy." A possible reference to the growing distrust of Iran by the Arab community over its behavior towards the uprising in Bahrain versus the Syrian uprising.
Nasrallah knows that if Syria falls, so does his supply line of missiles and other weapons from Iran. It would also significantly injure Iran's own hegemonic plans, of which Hezbollah is a key component.

If Syria falls, Hezbollah's perceived power in Lebanon would also be greatly diminished.

So, yes, Nasrallah is very nervous.

Similarly, Hamas' reaction to Israel's decision for a cease fire rather than a ground war is nothing more than machismo. Check out this poster on the Al Qassam site:



It says "Gaza won! They (the Israelis) are weak and delusional, they don't have resolve in war, they are like a spider web when faced by a gallant/noble(man)."

If you know you won a war, why do you have to work do hard to convince your people that you won the war? It should be pretty obvious, shouldn't it?

The harder Arabs try to appear strong, the weaker they really feel.

(h/ t MEMRI, Al Gharqad)


Jordanian paper accused MB of being part of Zionist Jewish conspiracy

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 07:15 AM PST

JordanZad has a very funny rant accusing the Muslim Brotherhood of the most heinous of crimes - being part of a secret Zionist-Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

You see, the Brotherhood works in many countries to be able to spy on fellow Arabs - just like the Jews! Egypt's president Mohammed Morsi follows the Masonic rules of US and Zionist gangs in the West in order to have them take over the most important Arab country.

Not only that, but the Muslim Brotherhood has been doing the bidding of the nefarious Zionists since its founding by Hassan el-Banna in the 1920s. The fastest way to achieve these Zionist aims is to hide under the cloak of Islam, getting clueless Muslims to give money to the movement in service of the Jews.

The Zionists, desperate for a truce after being solidly beaten by Hamas last week, leaned on their puppet Morsi to force Hamas to agree to a truce. (Hamas' own origins in the MB are not addressed in this otherwise scholarly article.)

The article goes on to describe the history of how Muslim Brotherhood terrorist attacks in Egypt throughout history were really designed by the Freemason Zionists. Including, for reasons only Jordanian columnists can conceive, the bombing of the Jewish Quarter in Cairo.

I would go into more detail, but I'm late for a meeting with the Egyptian consul to instruct him on next steps to destroying his country.







Arafat's bones being dug up in the Great Polonium Chase

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 05:30 AM PST

From AFP:
One of the Middle East's greatest political mysteries will come a step closer to being solved on Tuesday when scientists exhume iconic Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's remains to see if he was poisoned.

"It is very painful. It is a shock, and it is not easy for myself or my daughter," Arafat's widow Suha told AFP by telephone from her home in Malta ahead of the controversial procedure.

"But we must do it to turn the page on the great secrecy surrounding his death. If there was a crime, it must be solved."

French judges in charge of the investigation arrived on Sunday evening in the West Bank city of Ramallah, where Arafat's mausoleum stands in the grounds of the Muqataa complex from which the late leader ruled and where president Mahmud Abbas has his headquarters.
Rumours and speculation have surrounded Arafat's death ever since a quick deterioration of his health saw his passing at the Percy military hospital near Paris in November 2004 at the age of 75.

French doctors were unable to say what killed the Palestinians' first democratically-elected president and an autopsy was never performed, at his widow's request.
Arafat became president of the PA in 1994 - he essentially appointed himself. Although in 1996 the PA held "elections" where Arafat ran essentially unopposed to keep his incumbency.
But many Palestinians believed he was poisoned by Israel -- a theory that gained ground in July when Al-Jazeera reported Swiss findings showing abnormal quantities of the radioactive substance polonium on Arafat's personal effects.

The laborious investigation process will see French experts work alongside colleagues from Switzerland and Russia.

The Swiss are here because they were the first to analyse the Arafat samples submitted to them by Al-Jazeera.

The Russians' presence has not been fully explained by the Palestinians. However, the country is responsible for most of the world's polonium production and should therefore have the expertise to handle remains of the dangerous substance.
What kind of laughable reporting is this? The Russians are there because of concerns for the safety of eight-year old traces of polonium?

But that brings up the question of exactly why the Russians are there to begin with. Why would the PLO insist on bringing them in? Conspiracy theorists might think that they are there to plant polonium on the remains to be found by the French and Swiss.

The whole thing is a circus whose entire purpose is to find a way to blame Israel for Arafat's death. The National says, improbably:

It is possible that this latest inquiry will conclude natural causes, which would be closure of a sort.
Which is ridiculous. Even if nothing is found - or, less likely, strong evidence of a different cause of death - the Palestinian Arabs will continue to cling to their theory of his being murdered by Israel.

After all, how can you eliminate Joo-Rays?

My post about how the polonium numbers don't add up is here.


Iranian general impatient for orders to "liberate Jerusalem"

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 02:45 AM PST

Last Monday, Iranian Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Naqdi, commander of Iran's Basij forces, said that his forces were waiting impatiently for orders from the Supreme Leader of the Iranian Republic "to liberate Jerusalem."

He said, "The actions carried out by the countries in the region have so far been limited to recalling ambassadors which is no longer sufficient and acceptable due to the gravity of the situation...We expect Egypt to show more competence and strength, and to enter the arena [of war] in earnest for the defense of Gaza so that ... Egyptian masses will move to stop the attacks and the Zionist crimes in Gaza."

Naqdi continued, "Forces in Iran and the world are waiting impatiently for orders from the commander of the Islamic Revolution (Ali Khamenei) to liberate Jerusalem from the Zionist occupiers," stressing that "despite the aggression on Gaza, the process of elimination of the Zionist entity has become very close."

I particularly like how Naqdi is so willing to goad Egypt into war. I didn't see him fly to Cairo to volunteer.


אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה