Elder of Ziyon Daily News |
- Major riots in Jordan over fuel prices
- Collaborators!
- Egypt: Veiled women cut hair of Copt on Metro, throw her off
- Tuesday links
- Violent Islamist plan discovered to "conquer Egypt"
- Girl from Ashkelon explains living under rocket threat
- UNRWA's refusal to properly help the Palestinian Arabs
- Latest "shahid" shows that Israel didn't target civilians on Saturday
- Abbas again says the goal of the UN stunt is to establish borders
Major riots in Jordan over fuel prices Posted: 13 Nov 2012 07:00 PM PST From AP: Jordan's prime minister announced price hikes for gas and other fuel Tuesday, setting off demonstrations and calls for general strikes.Ammon News has the rundown: * Protests erupt in various governorates throughout kingdom against government decision to lift subsidies on oil derivativesWouldn't it be great if a friendly neighbor of Jordan's would offer to help out with its fuel crisis to head off these violent protests that threaten the regime? Oh, right. |
Posted: 13 Nov 2012 05:00 PM PST From COGAT: Civil Administration hosts meeting between Palestinian Authority and Israeli Ministry of Agriculture to discuss partnership in olive industry.In Israel, "collaboration" is a good thing. To Arabs, "collaboration" can get you killed. And so-called "peace activists" tend to side with the Arab definition. |
Egypt: Veiled women cut hair of Copt on Metro, throw her off Posted: 13 Nov 2012 02:00 PM PST From Bikya Masr: A Christian woman reported that she had her hair cut off by two veiled women inside the Egypt's capital city Cairo's metro and thrown out of the car while being called an "infidel." |
Posted: 13 Nov 2012 12:15 PM PST From Ian: Top 10 Reasons Why the Media Is Biased Against Israel "Within Israel there are far more journalists, both foreign and domestic, than in many larger countries and there are more foreign journalists in Israel than any other country in the region.No matter who the President or what is going on in the world, it seems Israel is always in the headlines. While there are many different reasons that the media is Anti-Israel, here is my list of the Top 10 Reasons Why the Media Is Biased against Israel:" Operation Take Back the Media "Our friends are listening. Our families are listening. And not to get too melodramatic on you, but, seriously, the world is listening. Explaining Gaza Before a military operation in Gaza is launched – if it is launched at all – Israel should make an effort to explain itself to the international community. "World opinion might be stacked against Israel, but we must not give up hope. UN secretary-general condemns Gazan rocket attacks Ban Ki-moon also urges Israel to exercise caution with regard to stray fire coming from Syria Hamas not considering ceasefire with Israel, spokesman says Islamic movement files complaint against Israel at the UN for 'crimes' against Gaza New app offers 'Sderot experience' 13-year-old comes up with program that keeps track of missile fire on southern Israel EU ban on Hezbollah may hinge on Burgas bombing French ambassador tells 'Post': Blacklisting Hezbollah's military wing rests on outcome of Bulgaria suicide bombing inquiry. Norway, Israel's "best friend" is now working to take the EU junior championship from Israel Campaign marking bombing of Jewish center wins Yahoo! Prize 'Bread of Memory' ads commemorate attack on Buenos Aires community building that killed 85 Questioned in court, head of UK academic union rejects anti-Semitism accusations Facing a Jewish lecturer's lawsuit, longtime Israel critic Sally Hunt denies members' anti-Zionism crossed a line into racism Neo-Nazis in Germany vandalize Holocaust memorials 'Stumbling blocks' project marks the homes of murdered Jews with name-bearing plaques Russian MP wants to buy Hitler's first home — so he can destroy it Frantz Klintsevich, a member of Vladimir Putin's ruling party, has launched a campaign to raise $2.8 million to purchase the dictator's Austrian birthplace New Israeli technology for Woolworth checkouts "Woolworths Limited, Australia's leading retail group, has signed a five-year System Integration (SI) Services agreement with Israel's Retalix. Under the agreement, Retalix will provide Level 2 and Level 3 support for more than 3,000 Woolworths locations and 25,000 point-of-sale (POS) terminals, serving more than 24 million customers every week across Australia and New Zealand." Israel in the frame (I) In September, StandWithUs brought to Israel 10 of the world's top Instagram users to take inspiring, fun photos of daily life in the country. Here's Part 1 of our "best of" series of selections. Also: Deprogramming students from the Palestine Solidarity Cult Good news: Egyptian man jailed for 2 years for sexual harassment Bad news: Women's equality article removed from Egypt's constitution |
Violent Islamist plan discovered to "conquer Egypt" Posted: 13 Nov 2012 10:30 AM PST From Al Arabiya, and inexplicably not too many other places: Egyptian security has recently uncovered a document circulated among armed groups and which details a plan to "conquer" Egypt and restore the Islamic caliphate.So there is a detailed plan. There is an organization. There are advanced weapons. Where is the coverage? |
Girl from Ashkelon explains living under rocket threat Posted: 13 Nov 2012 09:00 AM PST Dozens of kids from southern Israel attended a meeting held by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu with dozens of foreign diplomats in Ashkelon, as they told the diplomats what it was really like to grow up with thousands of rockets being fired at them any time of day or night. Speaking at the event was Netanyahu himself, as well as a student in a Negev university, who talked about the nuances of living under the threat of terror on a minute by minute basis. |
UNRWA's refusal to properly help the Palestinian Arabs Posted: 13 Nov 2012 07:15 AM PST Recently, the Commissioner General of UNRWA Filippo Grandi gave an impassioned speech to a UN subcommittee about the plight of Palestinian Arab "refugees" and how important UNRWA is and how it needs more money. Buried within the speech, Grandi grudgingly admits that Arab nations discriminate against Syrian refugees of Palestinian origin. Notice how he is reluctant both to explicitly describe what the Arab countries are doing and to actually criticize the Arab nations for effectively throwing Palestinian brethren under the bus: Under the Regional Response Plan, UNRWA is also asking for US$ 10 million to assist Palestine refugees from Syria fleeing to Jordan and Lebanon – currently numbering 1600 and 8000, respectively. Their situation - difficult, like that of other refugees fleeing Syria - adds to the tensions and complexities created by the pre-existing presence of large Palestine refugee communities in those countries. In spite of the relatively small number of Palestine refugees that have left Syria, their plight sadly confirms our view that - no matter how long they have lived in host countries and how hospitably they have been treated - they remain extremely vulnerable and exposed to the shocks of crises, given the centrality and sensitivity of the Palestinian question in the regional context.What he is saying is that Jordan and Lebanon, while accepting most Syrian refugees, are often sending Palestinian Arabs back to Syria to face an uncertain future or death. What he doesn't say is that many more would undoubtedly be fleeing if they knew that they would be protected - but Jordan and Lebanon aren't protecting them. (Chances are that Iraq isn't either.) But Grandi doesn't say this explicitly. He uses the most passive voice possible so as not to antagonize the Arab nations who have been screwing the people he is sworn to protect. Isn't it time to try a different angle? Specifically, UNRWA needs to go back to its original mandate of integrating Palestinian Arabs into their host countries. I just looked a little further at a document (referred to here) written by Lance Bartholomeusz, Chief, International Law Division, Department of Legal Affairs at UNRWA for UNRWA's 60th anniversary in 2010. It is really amazing, because it admits that UNRWA did have a mandate to resettle refugees - and somehow gave it up. Here is what he wrote about that mandate: More formally, the Agency has a mandate to consult with relevant governments about transitional arrangements in case of a durable solution. This part of the mandate is derived from a broader mandate existing since the Agency's establishment:Footnote 84: As to UNRWA's mandate to engage in activities to promote reintegration, see UNGA res. 393 (V) of 2 Dec. 1950 where the General Assembly "Instruct[ed] the Agency to establish a reintegration fund which shall be utilized for projects requested by any government in the Near East and approved by the Agency for the permanent re-establishment of refugees and their removal from relief" (para. 5) after "Consider[ing] that, without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, the reintegration of the refugees into the economic life of the Near East, either by repatriation or resettlement, is essential in preparation for the time when international assistance is no longer available, and for the realization of conditions of peace and stability in the area" (para. 4). This part of the mandate probably ended by 1960 when reference to "reintegration" was dropped from General Assembly resolutions relating to UNRWA, reflecting some acknowledgment that this objective had been defeated: see W. Dale, "UNRWA – A Subsidiary Organ of the UN", op. cit., 584–5.In other words, UNRWA's mandate never formally changed, but the UN stopped referring to it - hence a bizarre idea that it "probably" changed. Even that formulation by Lance Bartholomeusz that UNRWA's mandate changed in 1960 is belied by the language of subsequent UNGA resolutions on UNRWA - as late as 1992: The General Assembly...Notes with deep regret that ... no substantial progress has been made in the programme endorsed in paragraph 2 of resolution 513 (VI) for the reintegration of refugees either by repatriation or resettlement and that, therefore, the situation of the refugees continues to be a matter of serious concern... It doesn't make sense to note this "with deep regret" unless resettlement is an actual stated goal of the UN, and UNRWA is the only agency that was ever tasked to do that. It does not appear that UNRWA's mandate was ever formally changed away from resettlement. UNRWA just gave up. (And someone at the UNGA silently removed the language that was associated with the annual UNRWA resolution for every year in 1993, but no one noticed that the UN did that. Even so, the annual UN resolution is not the basis for UNRWA's mandate.) Moreover, if Bartholomeusz's contention that the mandate changed because Arab nations "defeated" it by refusing to integrate Palestinian Arabs into their midst after a mere ten years, then why can't Israel's refusal to accept the "return" of millions of descendants of these refugees for over sixty years end the UN's insistence of "return"? Apparently, intransigence by Arabs can change a UN agency mandate, but not Israel's insistence not to be destroyed by a fictional "right to return." An intriguing note in UNRWA's 1973 annual report also notes that the mandate of UNWRA is pretty much whatever UNRWA says it is in the absence of UNGA guidance: It is against this background of General Assembly resolutions that UNRWA must carry out its mandate, with little specific guidance from the resolutions conferring that mandate, which, in effect, has come to consist of maintaining, to the extent UNRWA's resources permit, the programmes it has gradually developed over the years.So UNRWA even admits that it makes things up as it goes along. But the corollary is that it is UNRWA that gave up on resettlement and then blamed the UN, not the UN itself instructing UNRWA. In the end, UNRWA is not serving the international community nor is it doing what is best for Palestinian Arabs. Indeed, UNRWA has no provision for "refugees" to lose that status - even if they become citizens elsewhere. Despite Grandi's supposed passion, he isn't willing to stick his neck out to shame Arab nations into doing what they do with every other Arab refugee. he is not willing to explicitly condemn Arabs for their role in perpetuating the misery of Palestinian Arabs. And he is not willing to work towards a lasting solution to the problem. (h/t Challah for research help) |
Latest "shahid" shows that Israel didn't target civilians on Saturday Posted: 13 Nov 2012 05:30 AM PST On Saturday evening, after Gaza militants shot an anti-tank weapon at an Israeli jeep well within Israeli territory, Israel responded by shelling the area that the attack came from, in the Sajaiya neighborhood. Four civilians were killed, and it looked from the outside like the IDF might have made a mistake. The PCHR even says that two of the dead were children "playing football." But now it looks like there was no mistake. Hamas, which claimed credit for the attack (along with other groups,) announced today the death of "mujahid" Mohammed Ziad, a member of the Al Qassam Martyrs Brigades. Ziad died of injuries from the same Israeli retaliatory strike Saturday night against those who shot the anti-tank weapon. While it is still sad that innocents were killed, now it seems that the "football playground" that was hit was actually the true source of the attack, just as Israel claimed, and the children playing there were human shields for Hamas. |
Abbas again says the goal of the UN stunt is to establish borders Posted: 13 Nov 2012 03:01 AM PST Once again, Mahmoud Abbas is stating, explicitly but in Arabic, that the drive for upgrading the status of "Palestine" at the UN from "non-member entity" to "non-member state" is really to pretend that the so-called "1967 borders" are legally "Palestinian" - even though the General Assembly does not have the right to establish borders. Here are his words to an Arab League meeting: We want to prove our territory is Palestinian and was occupied in 1967, including Jerusalem, because Israel has another concept, and says that the occupied Palestinian territories in '67 territories are in dispute or contested in the sense that they are subject to negotiations...We want the world to understand that the Palestinian territories occupied in 1967 are occupied territory of a State, or a State under occupation...Not a word about independence, or freedom, or statehood - the entire point of the stunt is to give the appearance of establishing borders, and afterwards Abbas can say that those borders are not negotiable because the UN has accepted them. When he says he is willing to negotiate afterwards with Israel, he is saying that the idea of borders are off the table, including Jerusalem. The draft resolution's mention of "delineation of borders to be determined in final status negotiations" is meant to say that only minor border adjustments would be allowed but purely as his own choice - he would be voluntarily ceding some land to gain other land, but the land is inherently "Palestine" to begin with, and not disputed at all. All he will negotiate is about prisoners and water and the other outstanding issues. His "negotiation" on the day after would not be Oslo negotiations; they would be a new set of negotiations between two states, in his formulation. The West seems clueless as to his plan to avoid negotiating the major issue that the Oslo process was meant to address, and indeed to abrogate the Oslo process altogether. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Elder of Ziyon To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה