Elder of Ziyon Daily News |
- Latest nonsense from Shlomo Sand - "The Land of Israel is a myth"
- Israel's space program (Scientific American)
- Iranian physicist sentenced to prison for spying with no evidence
- Former PA Mufti says Jerusalem not holy to Jews
- Why peace is impossible, reason #6350
- Gaza export totals this season
- Sorry, BDSers, but Israel's economy continues to grow
- "Muslim Brotherhood sent convoy of doctors to mutilate girls"
- Different prisoner agreement lessons between Arabic and English
Latest nonsense from Shlomo Sand - "The Land of Israel is a myth" Posted: 16 May 2012 08:33 PM PDT Shlomo Sand, the academic with no background in history who wrote an absurdly ridiculous book "The Invention of the Jewish People" to much acclaim by anti-semites, has now come out with a new piece of fiction masquerading as scholarship. And the anti-Zionists are lapping it up. I don't have the book, titled "The Invention of the Land of Israel," but Yossi Gurwitz's worshipful review at 972mag shows enough to prove that this book is as absurd as Sand's previous work (and that Gurwitz is as much of a fraud as Sand is.) As with the previous book, when Sand makes a blanket statement as fact, all one needs to do is provide a single counterexample to prove that he is a fraud. And as with his previous work, it is trivial to do exactly that. The heart of Sand's thesis is the intentional confusion in Zionism between the Halachic – Jewish law – concept of Eretz Israel ("The Land of Israel", EI) and the concept of a place which is under Jewish sovereignty, and yearning for such a place. "Eretz Israel" is, originally, a Talmudic concept – not a biblical one – which delineates it as a territory that imposes extra religious obligations on Jews living in it, which Jews living outside of it are unburdened of. Really? There was no concept of Eretz Yisrael in the Bible? It originated in the Talmud? Tell that to Ezekiel, who quoted God as using that exact term when delineating the borders of the Land in Ezekiel 47. The term is also used in Ezekiel 40:2, in 1 Samuel 13:19, and in 2 Chronicles 34:7. Of course, for much of the times of the Prophets, it was divided into two kingdoms - Israel and Judah. The latter phrase is used another half dozen times in the Bible. Moreover, the phrase "Kingdom of Israel" was used a number of times, as it was more specific designation than "Land of Israel." Is that enough to show that Sand is just making stuff up? Well, there's more: The rabbis came up with the Three Vows, which forbade Jews from massively emigrating to Eretz Israel, forbade them from rebelling against the nations of the world (it's worth noting the rabbis, servitors of the emperors, gave divine sanction to their rule), and the third vow is directed at the nations: "That they should not enslave Israel too much." Rabbinical Judaism left Eretz Israel behind. Sand quotes some later rabbis who opposed emigrating to EI since the Halachic demands on those living in it are very high, and failure to meet them would make the land impure.The Three Oaths are based on a Midrash and it is far from clear that they are legally binding. But even here Sand is being deceptive, because the relevant oath was not against Jews "massively emigrating to Eretz Israel" but against "storming the wall." What that exactly means is not clear but it probably means forcibly returning to Israel by war. The Talmudic discussion about this Midrash was referring to the desire of a single rabbi to move to Israel, not a "massive emigration." It was clearly not forbidden for Jews to move to Israel, because many of these rabbis who Sand say ignored the Land did in fact make aliyah. Encyclopedia Judaica gives details: During the time of the Second Temple there were many immigrants to Ereẓ Israel. A famous example is the aliyah of Hillel, who went from Babylonia (Pes. 66a) poor and without means, and later became the head of the Sanhedrin (Suk. 20a), founding a long line of nesi'im (see *nasi). One of the high priests appointed by Herod was Hananel ha-Bavli, i.e., of Babylonia. Aliyah, mainly from Babylonia, did not cease after the destruction of the Second Temple (70 c.e.). Sources cite many immigrant scholars who achieved a prominent place in the Jewish community of Ereẓ Israel. In the third generation of tannaim after the destruction of the Temple (110–135 c.e.), Hanan ha-Miẓri ("of Egypt"; Yoma 63b) and Yose b. Dormaskos, who went from Damascus (Sif. Deut. 1), are mentioned. The next generation (135–170 c.e.) included R. Johanan ha-Sandelar of Alexandria (tj, Ḥag. 3:1, 78d) and R. Nathan ha-Bavli, who was the son of the exilarch in Babylonia. Among the fifth generation of tannaim are (170–200) R. Ḥiyya the Great, the disciple and colleague of Judah ha-Nasi (Er. 73a), and Issi b. Judah (Pes. 113b), both of whom emigrated from Babylonia, and Menahem the Gaul (i.e., France; tj, Ber. 4:4, 8b).So far from Sand's thesis that the rabbis abandoned Israel and discouraged aliyah, many prominent members of their ranks actually moved to Israel themselves. If the Land of Israel was unimportant in Talmudic times, why would they do that? Oh well, Sand is proven a liar again. And his selective quoting of "some later rabbis" discouraging aliyah is shown to be more of an anomaly than a mainstream view, and proves that he is using sources selectively. As the article goes on to say, it was Christian persecution of Jews in Israel that slowed aliyah down dramatically after this, not any supposed "oath" based on a non-halachic midrash. Indeed, Maimonides himself - who counseled the Jews of Yemen not to rebel against their rulers based on his interpretation of the three oaths - moved to Israel himself, and Nachmanides declared moving to Israel to be obligatory. All of this of course predated Zionism by the better part of a millennium. So Sand is again shown to be an academic fraud, cherry picking sources that he pretends proves his point and even taking them out of context when it suits him. The only people who take him seriously are those who desperately want to believe him, because they have already made up their minds that Zionism is the world's biggest evil. |
Israel's space program (Scientific American) Posted: 16 May 2012 03:00 PM PDT Pretty cool: The Israeli space program is a minuscule operation compared to NASA or the European Space Agency—not surprising for a nation with about the land area and population of New Jersey. "The Israeli Space Agency does not have its own industries," Hershkowitz says. "It's just a very small body that coordinates in the activities of the other industries, and also coordinates between the civilian and the military applications." To do that, he says, the agency has an annual budget of about $50 million. Israel's presence in space is defined primarily by a network of Earth observation, communication and reconnaissance satellites. But Hershkowitz notes that his nation takes the overall enterprise of scientific research quite seriously. Israel leads the world in terms of percentage of GDP spent on research and development, and he notes that by some criteria its space program is fairly advanced:This is about Israel's official space program. It doesn't even cover the Israeli entry for the Google Lunar X Prize competition. Here's their webpage, although I don't see any recent updates. (h/t Brian at Israellycool) |
Iranian physicist sentenced to prison for spying with no evidence Posted: 16 May 2012 01:45 PM PDT From Nature: Maybe he should try a hunger strike. I'm sure that would be effective in an enlightened government like Iran's. (h/t L. King) |
Former PA Mufti says Jerusalem not holy to Jews Posted: 16 May 2012 12:30 PM PDT From Al Arabiya via MEMRI: Following are excerpts from an interview with former PA Mufti Sheik Ikrima Sabri, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on May 11, 2012: Except for this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And this.... And that's only from the past couple of years. |
Why peace is impossible, reason #6350 Posted: 16 May 2012 10:45 AM PDT Two articles in the mainstream Arabic press about yesterday's "Nakba Day" prove that as long as Israel exists in any form, Arabs will not accept it. No matter what. The first comes from the popular pan-Arab Al Quds al Arabi site. The title is all you need to know: "The 64-Year Occupation of Palestine." If the "occupation" is 64 years old, that means that even if Israel accedes to all the current PLO demands, there will still not be peace. The second comes from Jordan's Addastour site, which is titled "Palestine Nakba is a dagger in the side of the Arab nation." It goes through a ridiculous history lesson (did you know that one reason Arabs fled Palestine is because the Jews stole their water?) but the main point is that Israel is a dagger that must be removed for the Arab people to be healed. This is a critical point that Westerners cannot quite grasp. The conflict is not solvable. The Arab masses, brought up on generations of hate, are not going to accept Israel peacefully. The best anyone can hope for is a series of tactical truces and long term management of the conflict. And it is Israeli strength, not Israeli concessions, that is a prerequisite to having the Arab nations (including the PLO) grudgingly accept that Israel cannot be defeated and learn to deal with it. |
Gaza export totals this season Posted: 16 May 2012 09:15 AM PDT From Israel's COGAT: During the current season, more than 600 tons of strawberries, 250 tons of tomatoes, 50 tons of pepper and approximately 10,000,000 flowers, were exported thus far.This is besides the 2000 sweaters exported yesterday to England and the furniture exports earlier this year. If you are famous fact-challenged academic Juan Cole, this adds up to "zero." |
Sorry, BDSers, but Israel's economy continues to grow Posted: 16 May 2012 07:35 AM PDT From Globes: The Israeli economy grew by 3% on an annualized basis in the first quarter of 2012, the Central Bureau of Statistics reported today. The growth rate was above the 2.5% growth predicted in a "Bloomberg" poll of analysts, GDP growth in the first quarter was nevertheless less than in the two preceding quarters: 3.2% in the fourth quarter of 2011 and 3.3% in the third quarter.Sorry, haters, but it does not appear that BDS is making a dent in Israel's economy. In fact, on a daily basis, individual Israeli companies seem to be making deals that are worth more than the entire loss to Israel's economy from BDS in a decade of loud posturing and next to zero accomplishments. |
"Muslim Brotherhood sent convoy of doctors to mutilate girls" Posted: 16 May 2012 06:00 AM PDT From Bikya Masr: A number of Egyptian human rights groups have submitted a communication to the Attorney General Abdel Meguid Mahmoud against the Muslim Brotherhood`s political arm, the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) to investigate the complaints of people in the village of Abu Aziz in the Minya governorate, south of Cairo, over the existence of a large medical convoy organized by the party that wanders streets and does medical examination on people, including female circumcision, or female genital mutilation, in violation of Egyptian law, conventions and treaties signed by Egypt.It is unclear whether the story is true. The FJP denies it: The Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) Minya Secretary Dr. Diaa El-Maghazy said, "This report is completely false. The newspaper has republished it, although the FJP and Minya province health officials did refute the claims when first published by other papers and certain websites, three weeks ago".Al Arabiya reports on the Egyptian media claims about the convoy. Recently, an FJP member of Parliament voiced support for female genital mutilation so it is plausible that this medical convoy was doing things that are a bit unsavory; perhaps when asked, or perhaps volunteering. As the above story illustrates there seem to be many doctors in Egypt who recommend FGM for their patients. In the Arab world where rumors spread quickly, it is hard to know the truth and even respected newspapers are susceptible to printing unsubstantiated facts. |
Different prisoner agreement lessons between Arabic and English Posted: 16 May 2012 02:49 AM PDT From Ma'an, by Ali Sawafta of Reuters: Standing up to Israel through non-violent resistance can produce encouraging results, Palestinians said Tuesday, after a prisoner hunger strike produced some Israeli concessions.There are a few two problems with this thesis. One is that the hunger strikes were accompanied with threats from all parts of Palestinian Arab leadership, from Abbas through Hamas, saying that if any hunger strikers die there will be a huge breakout of violence against Israel (and the Red Cross and UN.) Another is that this "non-violent" lesson does not seem to be what Palestinian Arab media in Arabic is writing. I could not find this Reuters story in any Palestinian Arab newspaper, only this Egyptian one. And at the same time that this story was published, Hamas threatened to kidnap more soldiers for more prisoner swaps. I guess they didn't get the memo that "nonviolent resistance" is the way to go. Moreover, Islamic Jihad took a much different lesson from the episode of the hunger strikers: that Israel is fragile and easily defeated. Spokesman for al-Quds Brigades, Abu Ahmed, said in that prisoners are the fuel of the confrontation and the leaders of each stage, pointing out that the victory was a new quantum leap, and proved again that the occupying entity is fragile and defeated.Here is another case where the Palestinian Arabs seem to give one message to eager Westerners anxious to pretend that the culture of non-violence is widespread throughout the territories, and a different language altogether to their own people. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Elder of Ziyon To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה