Elder of Ziyon Daily Digest |
- Israelis mapping every grave in Mount of Olives
- Saudi religious police may force women to cover their sexy eyes
- Israel's (formerly) secret electronic war plans
- Palestinian Arab welfare, 1958
- Hamas jails man for "cursing God"
- A little anti-semitism from Belgium
- The wonderful UN (video)
- "Avenue Jew" - Brooklyn's answer to J-Street?
- Amnesty support for a kangaroo court
- PLO now saying no to "land swaps"
- The PA offers a deal that is no deal (updated)
- Too funny: Lebanese politicians get into fight on TV
Israelis mapping every grave in Mount of Olives Posted: 17 Nov 2011 11:00 PM PST From AP: A Jewish group in Jerusalem is using 21st-century technology to map every tombstone in the ancient cemetery on the Mount of Olives, a sprawling, politically sensitive necropolis of 150,000 graves stretching back three millennia. AP fails to mention that Arabs continue to vandalize Jewish graves at Har HaZeitim today. The most recent incident was on November 6 with at least five tombstones smashed. This website has photos and videos documenting the destruction of graves happening now (including Arabic graffiti.) Much of the recent desecration is documented in this video created by an organization dedicated to protecting the ancient holy site: The Mount of Olives - Har HaZeitim - is one of those areas on the east side of the Green Line that must remain under Jewish control. We saw how Jordan desecrated it during the 19 anomalous years that part of Jerusalem was Judenrein, and we see how Arabs will go out of their way to desecrate it today, with the tacit encouragement of the PA. The project to map the graves is very important. The project to protect it from Arab vandals is even more vital. But most important of all is to ensure that this hallowed ground where so many luminaries are buried remains, forever, in Jewish hands. |
Saudi religious police may force women to cover their sexy eyes Posted: 17 Nov 2011 07:42 PM PST Bikya Masr reports: Women with sexy eyes in Saudi Arabia may be forced to cover them up, according to the spokesperson of the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (CPVPV) in the conservative Gulf kingdom.Wouldn't it be more efficient to just gouge their eyes out when they are born? It's not like they'll ever have to drive or anything.... |
Israel's (formerly) secret electronic war plans Posted: 17 Nov 2011 03:30 PM PST Eli Lake at the Daily Beast reports on Israel's ability to wage cyberwar and attack infrastructure electronically. It's very interesting, but do we really want Iran to know this stuff? For much of the last decade, as Iran methodically built its nuclear program, Israel has been assembling a multibillion-dollar array of high-tech weapons that would allow it to jam, blind, and deafen Tehran's defenses in the case of a pre-emptive aerial strike. |
Palestinian Arab welfare, 1958 Posted: 17 Nov 2011 01:10 PM PST From AP, July 31, 1958: This reporter only interviewed those in refugee camps. There were actually tens of thousands who did get jobs in Iraq, Kuwait and other Gulf states, and have lived there for decades. But their Arab host countries refuse to give them citizenship even if they were born there and will die there. Hundreds of thousands were expelled from Kuwait after the first Gulf War and tens of thousands were chased out of Iraq after the second. And over a million more were stripped of their Jordanian citizenship in 1988. Because they are so useful as pawns against Israel, you can be sure that the intractable refugee problem of 1958 will never be solved as long as Arab nations refuse to grant the Arabs of Palestinian origin the same rights of naturalization they grant every other Arab. This apartheid system is part of the legal codes of these countries and no one is bothered by it because it serves the political purposes of Arab leaders. The only people being screwed are the Palestinian Arabs themselves, and who cares about them? Certainly not their so-called leaders. Certainly not any of the NGOs that pretend to love them so much. Certainly not Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch. Certainly not the UN, and (at least since 1960) certainly not UNRWA. After all, only one nation welcomed their Palestinian Arab refugees as full citizens after 1948, and as we all know, that country is guilty of apartheid. |
Hamas jails man for "cursing God" Posted: 17 Nov 2011 11:50 AM PST Ma'an Arabic reports that a man in Gaza was arrested for "cursing God" during an argument with his father in Qalqilya. According to Article (273) of the Jordanian Penal Code No. 16 of 1960 that Gaza uses as the basis for its laws, this offense is punishable for 1 to 3 years in prison. The entire code is interesting - it is the same one that is lenient for honor killings. Other laws:
Any Gaza lawyers want to go after the many insults to Judaism and Christianity we've seen there over the years? |
A little anti-semitism from Belgium Posted: 17 Nov 2011 10:40 AM PST The secretary-general of the Belgian teacher's union wrote an interesting letter to the editor of the Jewish News: The Palestinian people have just stirred. A small minority thought it could not. Fortunately [they became] a member of UNESCO. [In response, Israel] suddenly decided to expand the settlements.This prompted the Jewish News to remind Belgians that teachers in Jewish schools have nothing to do with Israeli policy and that they have the right to hold opinions that may be contrary to those of Mr. Deckers. A Jewish organization in Belgium gave a sarcastic response: Let us say immediately that in our view, Mr. Deckers certainly has nothing against the Jewish students. But, given his duties, what else could he do? Had he been in charge of agriculture he would have attacked the Jewish farmers. Nothing personal!The union distanced themselves from his comments and Decker ended up apologizing. It seems a shame, though, that I did not see any comment from the Belgian Jewish community actually defending the right of Israel to build in its capital city. Both articles took pains to distance the Belgian Jews from Israeli actions, with the subtext being that the actions themselves are indeed embarrassing and problematic. While this might indeed be the opinion of the Jewish leaders in Belgium, this could be a manifestation of a deeper fear that Belgian and other European Jews have in expressing their political opinions publicly. They know that they would be subject to anti-semitic attacks if they were too forthright in supporting Israel. More recently, Belgium's Pax Christi called for the boycott of Israeli goods like Osem snacks - specifically in Jewish neighborhoods. (h/t Rudi) |
Posted: 17 Nov 2011 09:30 AM PST |
"Avenue Jew" - Brooklyn's answer to J-Street? Posted: 17 Nov 2011 08:20 AM PST From Fox NY:
I don't find this so offensive; actually I think it is kind of funny. The word "Jew" is not an epithet. When people like Dov Hikind (who certainly tirelessly fights for the Jewish community in Brooklyn) start acting as if the word Jew without any context is automatically offensive, that is a much bigger problem to me. Put it this way: a proud but misguided Jewish kid could have done this, too. This is not to minimize the recent, horrific anti-semitic attacks in Midwood (attacks that the "progressive Jewish left" like MJ Rosenberg, Max Blumenthal and the 972mag crowd were silent about, as they instead tweeted endlessly about their anarchist heroes at Occupy Wall Street.) There is a definite problem that needs to be addressed. But this graffito* is not necessarily it. *Yes, I couldn't resist being pedantic. (h/t DoZ) |
Amnesty support for a kangaroo court Posted: 17 Nov 2011 07:10 AM PST The "Russell Tribunal for Palestine" is a publicity stunt where handpicked anti-Israel "jurists" listen to "testimony" from handpicked anti-Israel "witnesses" to come to foregone conclusions blaming Israel for everything under the sun. To maximize their ability to promote their Ziophobia, the people behind it just came out with a book called "Corporate Complicity in Israel's Occupation" based on "evidence" collected at the London session of the "tribunal" last year. Naturally, none of the corporations they decided to slam in this book appeared to testify at this joke of a "tribunal" but that doesn't stop these pursuers of justice, who include anti-Zionist luminaries such as Cynthia McKinney. The book, put out by the far-left Pluto Press, is being launched tonight in London. At the Amnesty International Human Rights Center. One cannot even detect the slightest bit of embarrassment at the unqualified support being given to anti-Israel bigots and their stunts. Then again - the London session of the "tribunal" was held at the exact same venue. |
PLO now saying no to "land swaps" Posted: 17 Nov 2011 06:00 AM PST From Gulf News: The Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) announced on Monday that it will very soon drop the "land swap" formula, which the it branded as a grave mistake that was included in any agreement with Israel.As Daled Amos points out, the official PLO position had indeed included land swaps - as recently as June: The Palestinian Authority passed on four official demands to the Mideast Quartet for discussion in upcoming meetings, PLO official Saeb Erekat told Saudi newspaper Al-Watan on Friday.How many lies must the PLO utter before the world realizes that they are nothing but a bunch of liars? This looks like a trial balloon. Abbas and his cronies have been repeatedly emphasizing the 1949 armistice lines lately without any mention of land swaps, pretending that international law supports the entire area seized by Jordan and Egypt at that time as somehow being inherently "Palestinian." The UN stunt can be interpreted minimally as the PLO claiming all of the territories, and plausibly as their claiming the 1947 partition lines. It seems that the PLO, feeling that they are in a strong political position, is abandoning the pretense of being interested in negotiations and is pushing for the world community to award them everything without any penalty. This means that the entire negotiations track documented in the Palestine Papers was nothing but a sham - a sop to the Americans and the EU as they pretended that they were interested in peace when in fact they just wanted not to get on the bad side of the West. The goal remains the same as it was in 1974: grab what you can in stages and then position yourself to grab more. And if that means to pretend to be moderate for a couple of decades, no problem. As we've seen, lying comes easy for Palestinian Arab leaders. And Western leaders can still not wrap their heads around the idea that people would lie directly to their faces. (h/t David G) |
The PA offers a deal that is no deal (updated) Posted: 17 Nov 2011 04:00 AM PST From Ha'aretz: The Palestinian Authority has offered the United States a deal, saying it would freeze all moves to achieve full membership for "Palestine" in various UN agencies until the end of January, a European diplomat said, while the United States and Israel would resume transferring it funds.This offer is a great example of how the PA does everything nowadays: It is a stunt. Every UN agency like WHO sees very well what happened to UNESCO after the US stopped funding it. They are not nearly as eager to accept the PLO as a member if it means that they lose tens of millions of dollars. I haven't seen any oil-rich Gulf nations step up to offer to make up the shortfall. And since the UNESCO vote, they have been forced to add a big yellow DONATE NOW button on their home page that wasn't there before. The PLO knows this very well and they know that forcing other UN agencies to choose between their support for the cause that has obsessed the UN for decades and losing the US money that they so desperately need to continue their giant bureaucracy will end up alienating the PLO. Beyond that, look at the timing being offered - to wait until January before starting a new UN push for membership. In January, five members of the security council rotate out, and it is possible that the PLO's next attempt to push for full membership would get them the 9 votes they need for a symbolic victory, forcing a US veto. They have already said they would keep trying until they get it. So they are offering literally nothing in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars. They are not offering to return to negotiations. They are not offering compromises. The response should properly be that they get zero support until they are ready to act like grownups and stop relying on publicity stunts and political games to avoid making the decisions necessary for peace. We have heard Israeli leaders from the right and the left all admit that they are willing to make "painful compromises" in order to achieve true peace with the Arabs. We have not heard the Palestinian Arab leaders ever say that phrase. Asking their people to give anything up for peace is utterly foreign to them, so instead we will keep seeing stunts - stunts that prove that the Palestinian Arabs have never been serious about a peace agreement and that today's leadership is just as intransigent as Arafat was. (h/t CHA) UPDATE: The PLO is now denying the story. |
Too funny: Lebanese politicians get into fight on TV Posted: 17 Nov 2011 01:30 AM PST From AP: Two prominent Lebanese politicians debating the unrest in neighboring Syria have exchanged blows on live television, in an indication of the deep divide between Lebanese factions over their relationship with Damascus.The video: MEMRI has the translated video (not embeddable, unfortunately), where it includes such gems as "My shoe commands more respect than you" and "Your sister..." |
You are subscribed to email updates from Elder of Ziyon To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה