Elder of Ziyon Daily Digest |
- Erdogan on CNN: Israel killed "hundreds of thousands of Palestinians"
- Palestinian Arab opposition to partition, 1947
- Surprise! Al Jazeera reporter was a Hamas member
- One of the released Iranian hostages is Jewish
- Al Qaeda in Yemen cuts off a boy's hand
- Hamas reiterates it wants Israel destroyed.
- Fact checking the detractors of the fact checkers of Abbas
- Saudis give women the right to vote, run for office
- Palestinian Arab intellectuals are all against Abbas
- Morning links
- Report behind the scenes of Abbas/Obama meeting
- Fake Gaza "children's art" hypocrites bar Zionists from show
Erdogan on CNN: Israel killed "hundreds of thousands of Palestinians" Posted: 26 Sep 2011 11:30 PM PDT From the transcript of Fareed Zakaria's interview with Tayyip Erdogan on CNN, Sunday: They say that Palestine is bombing and disturbing the people of Israel, and many Israelis have been killed. |
Palestinian Arab opposition to partition, 1947 Posted: 26 Sep 2011 06:00 PM PDT The entire Arab world reacted angrily at the concept of partition of Palestine, which was gaining currency in 1946 and early 1947. But the Palestinian Arabs themselves did not make any official statement about it until late January. Here, we can see the arguments used against partition by Jamal eff. Husseini, the PalArab delegate to the Anglo-Arab Conference on Palestine: Another Palestinian Arab leader, who was exiled after his role in the 1936-39 Arab terror spree, used a somewhat different argument - that partition would be bad for the Jews as well: This bizarre logic was refuted in October, when the Arabs of Palestine threatened to strike yet again against the concept of partition. This op-ed explains how that threat was the best proof for the necessity of a Jewish state: It is also a nice summary of the Jewish position on settling the land. |
Surprise! Al Jazeera reporter was a Hamas member Posted: 26 Sep 2011 12:57 PM PDT From JPost: Samer Allawi, Al Jazeera's former Afghanistan bureau chief, reached a deal with the Israel State state prosecutors office on Sunday under which he will receive a suspended sentence of three years after he confessed to conspiring in Hamas operations.Al Jazeera was indignant over his detention - but they never denied that he was a member of Hamas. And for some reason I don't think they'll be too upset that he offered to use his position at AJ to promote Hamas. |
One of the released Iranian hostages is Jewish Posted: 26 Sep 2011 12:00 PM PDT From The Jewish Exponent: By now, the whole world knows the name and face of Joshua Fattal, the 29-year-old Elkins Park native who spent 26 months in an Iranian prison before being reunited with his family last week in Oman and arriving back on U.S. soil on Sunday. |
Al Qaeda in Yemen cuts off a boy's hand Posted: 26 Sep 2011 11:00 AM PDT From the Yemen Post: According to residents in the southern Yemeni province of Abyan, alleged al-Qaeda militants would have severed the hands of 2 people, including that of a 15-year old boy. [I don't know why it says "would," from the article and others it is clear that they did. - EoZ]How dare anyone criticize someone's religion! (This story was picked up by AFP but got very little coverage.) |
Hamas reiterates it wants Israel destroyed. Posted: 26 Sep 2011 10:00 AM PDT Hamas' leader Ismail Haniyeh made another widely reported speech in Gaza today explaining in very precise terms what Hamas' position is on the PLO bid for statehood. He said that Hamas supports the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state, under two conditions: Never recognize Israel and never concede a single inch of "Palestine." Haniyeh also bristled at the suggestion that Hamas and the US had anything in common in opposing the PLO bid at the UN. He said American didn't want the PLO to go to the UN in order to extract more concessions, while Hamas was against it because it implied that they were giving too many concessions. He stressed that Hamas wants "liberation first and then the state," saying that a state is not created by UN resolutions or compromises but by "steadfastness and resistance." He added that he was always interested in unity with the PLO. Less widely reported was that he made this speech in front of a group of Islamic scholars, stressing how important their role is in the future "Palestine" he envisions. He also praised Nizar Rayan. Rayan was the spiritual authority of Hamas and liaison between its "political" and "military" wings who strongly supported suicide bombing and who was killed in the Gaza war when he refused to leave his home and save his wife and kids after Israel warned him they were going to bomb. Despite the crystal clear message, you can bet that in the coming year some credulous Western reporter will say that Hamas is pragmatic and willing to accept Israel's existence, if only implicitly, because of some artfully ambiguous statements Hamas will make in English. |
Fact checking the detractors of the fact checkers of Abbas Posted: 26 Sep 2011 09:00 AM PDT AP issued a "fact check" of Abbas' speech on Friday. Roi Maor of +972 magazine pretends to demolish AP's arguments, using his own bizarre definitions of "facts." It is too tedious to list each of the three texts here, but if you are interested, follow the links. Here is my response on the 972mag site:: Abbas was wrong that the Pals live "under the only occupation in the world." Maor changes the definition in order to argue, but in fact there are quite a few. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_occupations Abbas didn't use the term "prisoners of conscience" but "political prisoners." Some are indeed political, some are terrorists. Both AP and Maor are wrong here. Abbas said that Palestine is the Holy Land and specifically mentioned the (purported) Muslim and Christian history there, deliberately excluding the older and uncontested Jewish ties to the land. it was obviously not an oversight. AP is correct, Maor is wrong. AP is accurate in saying that the Palestinians rejected two peace offers. Maor doesn't prove otherwise, merely claiming it is "inaccurate." AP accurately notes that the conflict predates settlements. Maor ignores this. So while AP wasn't perfect, Maor is being quite deceptive in his tendentious argument against it. |
Saudis give women the right to vote, run for office Posted: 26 Sep 2011 08:00 AM PDT Good news: Saudi King Abdullah announced on Sunday he was giving women the right to vote and run in municipal elections, the only public polls in the ultra-conservative Gulf kingdom.There is a long way to go, but this is a very welcome step in the right direction. |
Palestinian Arab intellectuals are all against Abbas Posted: 26 Sep 2011 07:00 AM PDT Even though Mahmoud Abbas has achieved more popularity than he ever had before in the wake of his vitriolic speech against Israel at the UN, it is hard to ignore that it is difficult to find any Palestinian Arab columnists who support his UN move. And their objections to him are, invariably, that he is not being intransigent enough. The themes that they hammer on are pretty consistent: Abbas is giving up on asserting the "rights" of taking over Israel. He is only insisting on "22% of historic Palestine." He is giving up on the option of violent resistance. He is not representing all Palestinian Arabs. His political party is corrupt. For these people, and the leftist friends they have made, nothing is satisfactory short of the destruction of Israel. Only that would bring the "justice" they claim to crave so much - at the expense of the people they are pretending to help. (By and large, these "intellectuals" live in Western countries) The Western media ignores the extreme anti-Israel sentiments of these mostly Western-educated commentators. The press will characterize those opposed to Abbas' supposed moderation as Islamists and wild-eyed fanatics, but never will the media notice the people who wear suits and teach in Columbia and Oxford whose views are just as intolerant and bigoted as those of the terrorists. Just read Electronic Intifada or Palestine Telegraph, for example. So even if, by some miracle, Abbas wakes up and realizes that the only way his people can prosper is by negotiating and compromising with Israel, he will have zero support from the influential Arab intellectuals in the media and academia. Even if there is a peace agreement, there will always be a steady drumbeat for war (in the name of, as always, "human rights" and "justice.") And as we have seen in Egypt and Turkey, paper agreements can disappear in an instant. All it takes is a single excuse, real or imagined. Which means that the best possible scenario for peace is still pretty dismal. |
Posted: 26 Sep 2011 06:00 AM PDT Mudar Zahran on the real reasons Abbas went to the UN: Today Abbas is an illegitimate "president," who has overstayed his term two years by refusing to hold free elections; unable to enforce his government's authority on the Gaza Strip, or even to return to his own house there which was seized by Hamas when it took over the Gaza Strip in 2005, forcing out Abbas's Palestinian Leadership Organization [PLO] in a matter of days. Hamas has since consolidated its rule over the Gaza strip, with no sign of Abbas and his fellow PLO leaders being able to restore their authority there. Hamas has consistently shown carelessness, to say the least, toward any "reconciliation" with Abbas, and has not offered any concessions whatever in that regard....[But] At the UN, Abbas was the Palestinians' hero. He was speaking their woes and representing their worries to the world. It did not mater to the average Palestinian that Abbas and other PA officials were living richly while Palestinians suffered; it did not matter that Abbas's political opponents were still being held in Palestinian jails merely for disliking Abbas; nor did it matter that Abbas -- who was requesting for a Palestinian state— was and still is a Jordanian citizen. Abbas seems to have been forgiven by his people for all his sins simply because he invested in an emotionally-charged up speech. Elliott Abrams at NRO: Abbas strikes out. The rapturous applause that greeted Mahmoud Abbas, appearing before the U.N. General Assembly in his role as chairman of the PLO, was deceiving. The collection of states that swooned when he mentioned Yasser Arafat's 1974 appearance in the same hall will never give him a state — nor even the foreign-aid money to pay his delegation's hotel bills.GIYUS: Is there still hope for peace? The UN is a massive joke by David Akin at the Toronto Sun CAMERA: LA Times remakes Ben-Hur into a "Palestinian nobleman" Naharnet reports "Israeli Commandos Helped Hizbullah 'Minister of Infrastructure' Escape Lebanon" Anti-Semitism: the real issue that dare not speak its name at The Australian Arutz-7: The gun of Asher Palmer - the man who was killed with his son when their car was hit by rocks by Palestinian Arab terrorists - was missing from its holster. "Death to Jews" in Paris Muslim march. Point of No Return looks at the Moroccan Holocaust conference And then there is this beautiful graphic at MidEast Truth: (h/t Yerushalimey, jzaik, Yoel) |
Report behind the scenes of Abbas/Obama meeting Posted: 26 Sep 2011 04:43 AM PDT Palestine Press Agency quotes a source who says what happened behind the scenes during the meeting between President Obama and Mahmoud Abbas last Thursday. According to the source, Obama told Abbas that if a drop of American blood is shed as a result of a US veto, he would hold Abbas personally responsible. Abbas answered that it is up to God. In response, Abbas threatened to dissolve the PA and leave the international community in charge of the fate of the Palestinian Arabs. The same source says that a number of Arab countries also tried to convince Abbas not to go forward with the bid, including Morocco, Jordan and the UAE. The report goes on to say that Abbas conferred with the PLO leadership at the last minute to see if they wanted him to postpone the bid, but he was convinced by the enthusiasm of the crowds at the rallies (that his government engineered to begin with!) The source also said that Abbas is trying to distance the US from any role in future negotiations. |
Fake Gaza "children's art" hypocrites bar Zionists from show Posted: 26 Sep 2011 02:36 AM PDT Here is how the "Middle East Children's Alliance" - the rabidly anti-Israel organization whose Gaza director supports terrorism - characterized the decision by the Oakland Museum of Children's Art to not allow their anti-Israel propaganda from being shown: This is the sign posted outside the storefront where the questionable "Child's View from Gaza" exhibit was being shown this weekend. The people who loudly complained that their propaganda was being "censored" by the Oakland Museum of Children's Art - the people who believe that all children and parents visiting the museum must be subjected to their probably faked anti-Israel propaganda allegedly drawn by Gaza children whether they like it or not - refuse entry to certain types of people they don't deem worthy. Here's the video of them refusing to allow a Zionist to enter: Censorship! |
You are subscribed to email updates from Elder of Ziyon To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה